Sign-up for Automatic Receipt of Articles
MUNKNEE ON : FACEBOOK | TWITTER
|

4 Bombshell Reports Suggest: Peak Oil Now an Imminent Reality

Official recognition of the peak oil threat has been muted up until now, couched in warnings about “adequate investment” and blithe assertions that demand would soon peak, averting any supply shortage. All that seems to have changed in the last month with a sudden deluge of reports and summit meetings suggesting that the oil industry and energy officials are now taking peak oil very seriously indeed. Words: 990

In further edited excerpts from the original article* Chris Nelder (www.EnergyAndCapital.com) goes on to say:

UK Task Force on Peak Oil: Shortages by 2015
The first bombshell was actually dropped on February 10, when the UK Industry Task Force on Peak Oil and Energy Security issued a report called “The Oil Crunch: A wake-up call for the UK economy.” It was a stern warning that “oil shortages, insecurity of supply and price volatility will destabilise economic, political, and social activity potentially by 2015.” The task force comprised top UK executives and energy experts and the report was personally endorsed by Sir Richard Branson.

The British government, including energy minister Lord Hunt, responded by staging a closed-door summit meeting with the taskforce on March 22. As the UK’s Guardian reported, the government intended to develop an action plan to contend with a near-term peak, and to “calm rising fears over peak oil.”

Veteran peak oil analyst and taskforce member Jeremy Leggett explained: “Government has gone from the BP position — ’40 years of supply left, the price mechanism works, no need to worry’ — to ‘crikey’.” He urged the assembly to properly assess the risks of peak oil, and to immediately begin preparing for the end of globalization and an era of oil shortages in the West.

According to reports from attendees, the summit yielded some important conclusions:
1. Peak oil is either here, or close enough.
2. Prices will have to go higher as demand outstrips supply.
3. Governments will be forced to intervene to maintain critical levels of oil supply, and limit volatility.
4. Rationing measures may be unavoidable.
5. Electrification of transport must be pursued in order to reduce demand.
6. Communities will need to work quickly to reorganize around walking instead of driving, producing food and energy locally instead of importing, and generally try to reduce their need for oil.

The notion that peak oil will mean the end of economic growth, however, apparently fell on deaf ears. Still, the very fact that the government has engaged with the peak oil community and formed a parliamentary group to study the issue offers a sliver of hope that, at least in the UK, we’ll have some measure of consciousness about the issue and an idea of what to do about it as we drive off the peak oil cliff.

Kuwait Report: Peak by 2014
The next bombshell were the findings of a report that surfaced around March 12 by three authors from the College of Engineering and Petroleum at Kuwait University. They applied advanced mathematics to reserve and production data for the top 47 oil producing countries using a multi-cycle Hubbert model which demonstrated a much better fit to historical data than single-cycle Hubbert Curve analyses. What made this report interesting was that first, it was from Kuwait; and second, it brought a new level of mathematical rigor to the study.

The model estimates that:
1. the world’s ultimate crude oil production will peak in 2014 around 79 mbpd.
2. the annual depletion rate of world reserves was estimated to be around 2.1%.
3. non-OPEC production peaked in 2006 at 39.6 mbpd.
4. OPEC production will peak in 2026 at 53 mbpd with the majority of the increase coming from Iraq, Kuwait, and the United Arab Emirates.
5. OPEC production is expected to decline to 29 mbpd by 2050.

ConocoPhillips: Pursuing New Oil Reserves Not Worth While
On March 25, ConocoPhillips (COP) CEO Jim Mulva admitted that pursuing new oil reserves just doesn’t pay. The remaining resources have become too marginal and too expensive, and the competition for them has become too intense. As such, Conoco has decided to sell $10 billion worth of its assets over the next two years, all of them in the marginal category, and concentrate on producing its core assets using the proceeds to buy back its stock, reduce its debt, and raise dividends — just as rival ExxonMobil (XOM) has been doing for the last five years or so.

Oxford Report: Reserves Exaggerated by One Third
On March 22, another bombshell exploded in the press as former UK chief scientist David King and researchers from Oxford University released a paper claiming that the world’s oil reserves had been “exaggerated by up to a third,” principally by OPEC.

Specifically, the report maintains that:
1. conventional oil reserves stand at just 850-900 billion barrels — not the 1,150-1,350 billion barrels that are officially claimed by oil producers and accepted by the politically influenced IEA.
2. demand could outstrip supply by 2014-2015.
3. the belief that alternative fuels such as biofuels could mitigate oil supply shortages and eventually replace fossil fuels is a pie in the sky. Instead of relying on those silver bullet solutions, we have to make better use of the remaining resources by improving efficiency.

The future of fuel will indeed be all about efficiency and alternative energy. This process is well underway. Hundreds of billions will be made as a select group of companies slowly eradicate the rampant waste in our electricity distribution system, which has been estimated at upwards of 60% by analysts.

*http://seekingalpha.com/article/196876-officials-wake-up-to-peak-oil?source=email (Visit Energy and Capital to sign up for their free e-letter.)

Editor’s Note:
- The above article consists of reformatted edited excerpts from the original for the sake of brevity, clarity and to ensure a fast and easy read. The author’s views and conclusions are unaltered.
- Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
- Sign up to receive every article posted via Twitter, Facebook, RSS feed or our Weekly Newsletter.
- Submit a comment. Share your views on the subject with all our readers.
- Buy the book below from Amazon. It’s pertinent to this article and inexpensive too.

Related Posts:

Short URL: http://www.munknee.com/?p=9953

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of munKNEE.com or any other munKNEE.com authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors or partners. Notices

Posted by on Apr 11 2010, With 0 Reads, Filed under Oil and Gas. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Register and Top 40 Gold Stocks

COMMENTS

To post a comment, you must login using Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, or Hotmail in the box below.
Don't have a social network account? Register and Login direct with our site and post your comment.
Before you post, read our Comment Policy - Legal Notice


Comments Closed

1 Comment for “4 Bombshell Reports Suggest: Peak Oil Now an Imminent Reality”

  1. Any discussion about oil prices over the next decade must include an attempt to quantify emerging economy demand as an important driver at the margin. Here is a simple thought experiment using Chinese demand to give some idea of the magnitude of the supply issues we face:
    - China moves from 3 bbls/person/year to the South Korean per capita consumption level of 17 bbls/person/year
    - Transition takes 30 years
    - No peak in global production

    In next 10 years we must find 44 million BOPD. If you superimpose peak production on top of this demand profile using the following parameters oil prices would increase approximately 250% in real terms over next 10 years:
    - Oil demand elasticity of -0.3
    - Current production 84 million BOPD, current price US$ 80
    - Peak production 100 million BOPD
    - Post peak decline rate of 3-4%

    If you want to try the model for yourself using your own assumptions it can be found at: http://www.petrocapita.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=128&Itemid=86

Comments are closed

 

WHAT'S HOT

  1. von Greyerz: Expanding Central Bank Balance Sheets Guarantee Massively Higher Inflation & Gold/Silver Prices – Here’s Why
  2. American Grads: Here’s a Great Guide to Personal Finance
  3. David Nichols: Expect to See $2,750 – $3,000 Gold By June 2013 – Here’s Why
  4. The 5 Stages of Collapse: Where Are We Currently?
  5. Alf Field Sees Silver Reaching $158.34 Based on His $4,500 Gold Projection!
  6. The GOOD, the BAD, and the Downright UGLY Factors Affecting the USD!
  7. S&P 500 Should Continue Climbing Until October and Then Decline 15-30%! – Here’s Why
  8. U.S. House Prices Have MUCH Further To Fall! Here’s Why
  9. U.S. Can NOT Avoid Coming Economic Collapse – No Matter What! Here’s Why
  10. Leeb: Gold Going to $3,000 Before the End of 2012!
  11. Creating More Inflation is Now the Official Policy of the Fed
  12. Ground Level Insights Into the “China Condition”
  13. Bock and Rickards Agree: Governments Want Gold to Go Higher!
  14. Williams STILL Believes a Hyperinflationary Great Depression is Coming! Here’s Why
  15. Governments Will Want – Will NEED – Much Higher Gold Prices! Here’s Why
  16. These Major U.S. Companies On Verge Of Collapse
  17. It’s Time to Buy Gold/Silver, Hide It, and Wait For the Smoke to Clear! Here’s Why
  18. Silver Will Go to $50 and Then Explode Dramatically Higher! Here’s Why
  19. Alf Field: Correction in Gold is OVER and on Way to $4,500+!
  20. Why Did the Baltic Dry Index Collapse? Here’s Why
  1. mygoldmygold: Wow…that’s a nice prediction…I don’t think we can predict 100% accurately...
  2. taluis: A punitive Sales or Capital Gains Tax on the sale of gold in an economic collapse (or similar situation) is...
  3. steviebee: But….if gold is going to $10,000, why should I only have “7 to 15% in Precious Metals”...
  4. GoldRate: it will be interesting to see if this triangle breaks up or down. We’ve had big volatility this week....
  5. Blindfolded Monkey: I don’t have quite the same negative view of Paul Krugman but I agree that it is clear that...


DISCLOSURE: It is our intent that all posts on this site be in accordance with the requirements, restrictions and terms of the Copyright Law of the United States and all other copyright treaties to which the United States is party and more specifically of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act - Blogger . As such, all posts on this website have been screened at Library of Congress Catalog as to their eligibility for posting. Should any post be deemed to be inadvertently in contravention of these Acts' terms please advise with substantiation of such apparent contravention (i.e. registration number) and the article in question will be immediately deleted from the site. Also, visit U.S. Code 17-107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights - Fair Use
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of financial, economic and investment issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER: Lorimer Wilson and Johnny Punish are not registered advisors and do not give investment advice per se. The articles to be found on the site are expressions of opinion only and should not be construed in any manner whatsoever as recommendations to buy or sell a stock, option, future, bond, commodity or any other financial instrument at any time. Please consult with a qualified investment advisor who is licensed by appropriate regulatory agencies in your legal jurisdiction before making any investment decisions, and barring that, we encourage you confirm the facts on your own before making important investment commitments. The information on this site was obtained from sources which we believe to be reliable, but we do not guarantee its accuracy. None of the information, advertisements, website links, or any opinions expressed constitutes a solicitation of the purchase or sale of any securities or commodities. Please note that while Wilson and Punish may already have invested or may from time to time invest in securities that are recommended or otherwise covered on this website they do not intend to disclose the extent of any current holdings or future transactions with respect to any particular security and, as such, you should consider this before investing in any security based upon statements and information contained in any report, post, comment or recommendation you read on the site.