Sign-up for Automatic Receipt of Articles
MUNKNEE ON : FACEBOOK | TWITTER
|

Dividend Growth and Sustainability Crucial in Any High-Yield Stock Selection

Most novice dividend investors typically are under the impression that successful dividend investing entails finding and purchasing the highest yielding stocks. This strategy is flawed, because it does not take into account the sustainability of the dividend. Words: 671

In further edited [ ] excerpts from the original article* the DividendGrowthInvestor.com goes on to say:

Dividend Sustainability
I purchased American Capital (ACAS) in 2008 when this business development company was trading at $30 and was yielding 13%. Just a few months later the company suspended its dividend payment, and I sold it immediately. The thing to learn from this example is that investors have to check the sustainability of distributions in light of cash flows generated by the business, the amounts of debt relative to total assets and the amounts of interest expenses. If you find a high yielding stock, which generates enough cash flow growth and has limited amounts of debt, then it could be a buy on the next dip.

Dividend Growth
While companies are not contractually obligated to share profits with shareholders, it is nice to see when boards increase dividends and declare stock buybacks, This typically sends positive signals about management’s confidence in projected cashflows, generated by the business.

I like to hold stocks with different yield/dividend growth characteristics where yields are somewhere between 3% and 5% and dividend growth is in the upper single digits or in the double digits.

I do realize however that some investors are interested mostly in current income generation, and not so much about future dividend growth. Thus recommending Wal-Mart with its 2% dividend yield to an investor who wants to generate as much income as possible now might sound ridiculous. Just because one wants to generate as much income as possible however, doesn’t mean that they should throw caution away with the wind. Sustainability of the dividend should be evaluated, in addition to sustainability of the dividend growth. A stock with a sustainable but unchanged dividend, which yields 9% on cost, would produce a lower inflation adjusted income level over time.

The 4% Rule
In addition to that, most studies of portfolio durability show that one should not spend more than 4% of their portfolio value each year. If you have a dividend portfolio valued at $1 million dollars, which generates $40,000/year in dividend income, and whose dividend growth closely matches the inflation rate, you are ok as long as you don’t spend more than $40,000/year. If you spend more than that, you could end up eating your principal.

Thus, even if you found the highest dividend stock, you should not be spending more than 4% of the starting value of your portfolio each year, adjusted for inflation. If you owned a 10% yielder on a $1 million portfolio, and you spend all your dividend income, you would be in trouble when one of two things happen:

1) The company cuts dividends
2) The company fails to increase dividends to compensate for the eroding value of inflation

Fixed Income
In order to increase portfolio longevity, I would consider at least a 25% allocation to fixed income, which would provide some buffer during bear markets and deflationary environments. In addition to that, having an allocation to lower yielding stocks with higher dividend growth characteristics could also provide a buffer for dividend increases if you are lucky enough to spend more time in retirement.

Conclusion
Your goal should always be for your money to outlive you, no matter what. [High yield stocks with both the liklihood of long term growth and sustainability will achieve just that.]

*http://www.dividendgrowthinvestor.com/2009/10/six-dividend-stocks-for-current-income.html

Editor’s Note:
- The above article consists of reformatted edited excerpts from the original for the sake of brevity, clarity and to ensure a fast and easy read. The author’s views and conclusions are unaltered.
- Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
- Sign up to receive every article posted via Twitter, Facebook, RSS feed or our Weekly Newsletter.
- Submit a comment. Share your views on the subject with all our readers.
- Buy the book below from Amazon. It’s pertinent to this article and inexpensive too.

Related Posts:

Short URL: http://www.munknee.com/?p=9828

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of munKNEE.com or any other munKNEE.com authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors or partners. Notices

Posted by on Apr 7 2010, With 0 Reads, Filed under Investing. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Register and Top 40 Gold Stocks

COMMENTS

To post a comment, you must login using Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, or Hotmail in the box below.
Don't have a social network account? Register and Login direct with our site and post your comment.
Before you post, read our Comment Policy - Legal Notice


Comments Closed

Comments are closed

 

WHAT'S HOT

  1. Are You A Sucker? If Not, Here’s The Reality About America’s “Recovery”!
  2. First Extreme Sports – Now Extreme Investing: A Look at Leveraged ETFs
  3. Investing in Mutual Funds is a Loser’s Game! Here’s Why
  4. How Inflationary and Deflationary Outcomes Might Affect Your Bullion and Mining Shares
  5. U.S. Fiscal Situation MUCH Worse Than Government Lets On!
  6. Taking What Buffett Says Literally Would Hurt Your Portfolio Returns! Here’s Why
  7. Trading Using Technical Analysis is a Mug’s Game! Here’s Why
  8. Forget the EMH: Motivated Stock Pickers CAN Beat the Market!
  9. Invest in Natural Gas – Here’s How
  10. Gold: $3,000? $5,000? $10,000? These 151 Analysts Think So!
  11. Want to Invest In Agriculture? Here’s How – and Where
  12. von Greyerz: Expanding Central Bank Balance Sheets Guarantee Massively Higher Inflation & Gold/Silver Prices – Here’s Why
  13. David Nichols: Expect to See $2,750 – $3,000 Gold By June 2013 – Here’s Why
  14. The 5 Stages of Collapse: Where Are We Currently?
  15. Alf Field Sees Silver Reaching $158.34 Based on His $4,500 Gold Projection!
  16. U.S. Can NOT Avoid Coming Economic Collapse – No Matter What! Here’s Why
  17. Silver Will Go to $50 and Then Explode Dramatically Higher! Here’s Why
  18. Alf Field: Correction in Gold is OVER and on Way to $4,500+!
  19. These Major U.S. Companies On Verge Of Collapse
  20. Leeb: Gold Going to $3,000 Before the End of 2012!
  1. mygoldmygold: Wow…that’s a nice prediction…I don’t think we can predict 100% accurately...
  2. taluis: A punitive Sales or Capital Gains Tax on the sale of gold in an economic collapse (or similar situation) is...
  3. steviebee: But….if gold is going to $10,000, why should I only have “7 to 15% in Precious Metals”...
  4. GoldRate: it will be interesting to see if this triangle breaks up or down. We’ve had big volatility this week....
  5. Blindfolded Monkey: I don’t have quite the same negative view of Paul Krugman but I agree that it is clear that...


DISCLOSURE: It is our intent that all posts on this site be in accordance with the requirements, restrictions and terms of the Copyright Law of the United States and all other copyright treaties to which the United States is party and more specifically of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act - Blogger . As such, all posts on this website have been screened at Library of Congress Catalog as to their eligibility for posting. Should any post be deemed to be inadvertently in contravention of these Acts' terms please advise with substantiation of such apparent contravention (i.e. registration number) and the article in question will be immediately deleted from the site. Also, visit U.S. Code 17-107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights - Fair Use
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of financial, economic and investment issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER: Lorimer Wilson and Johnny Punish are not registered advisors and do not give investment advice per se. The articles to be found on the site are expressions of opinion only and should not be construed in any manner whatsoever as recommendations to buy or sell a stock, option, future, bond, commodity or any other financial instrument at any time. Please consult with a qualified investment advisor who is licensed by appropriate regulatory agencies in your legal jurisdiction before making any investment decisions, and barring that, we encourage you confirm the facts on your own before making important investment commitments. The information on this site was obtained from sources which we believe to be reliable, but we do not guarantee its accuracy. None of the information, advertisements, website links, or any opinions expressed constitutes a solicitation of the purchase or sale of any securities or commodities. Please note that while Wilson and Punish may already have invested or may from time to time invest in securities that are recommended or otherwise covered on this website they do not intend to disclose the extent of any current holdings or future transactions with respect to any particular security and, as such, you should consider this before investing in any security based upon statements and information contained in any report, post, comment or recommendation you read on the site.