Sign-up for Automatic Receipt of Articles
MUNKNEE ON : FACEBOOK | TWITTER
|

Many U. S. Debt Obligations are Unrecognized, Unmeasured, Unmanaged and Unfunded

When people find themselves in a situation where they feel they don’t have a decent grip on the risks they face, or where a great deal of critical information is hidden from view, emotions can easily overwhelm rational decision-making. Is it so farfetched to think that a sudden loss of confidence in the United States’ ability to manage its finances could evoke similar fears about just how large and widespread the fallout might be? Words: 1026

So says Michael Panzer* (www.financialarmageddon.com) regarding the edited excerpts of an article** written by Jeanne Sahadi of www.money.cnn.com/) as follows:

Debt That’s Accounted For
When anyone talks about U.S. debt, they typically refer to a) the debt held by the public (i.e. money owed to those who have bought U.S. Treasurys, most notably big bond mutual funds and foreign governments) and b) the money the federal government owes to government trust funds, such as those for Medicare and Social Security. in addition to that public debt are the trillions in unforseen and underplayed obligations that could make the debt outlook much much worse.

Here is just a sampling of the debt obligations not on the books that the deficit hawks are so worried about:

Debt That’s Not on the Books

1. Losses from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are Unmeasured, Unrecognized in the Budget and Unmanaged
Mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are private companies that for years had the implicit backing of the federal government. That backing assured investors that if anything went seriously south for the companies Uncle Sam likely — although not absolutely — would step in. Well, things did go south, and now both are run by the federal government.

While the implicit guarantee has become explicit for Fannie and Freddie, its treatment in the budget is up in the air. “Our budget doesn’t have Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac on it, even though it’s owned lock, stock and barrel by the American taxpayer,” said Rudolph Penner, a former director of the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) during a conference held by the Peterson-Pew Commission on Budget Reform.

Last year, the CBO did start to account for both companies as if they were federal agencies on the budget but the White House Budget Office only includes some potential costs because the future of the two companies is still under consideration.

It’s estimated that the total loss on the mortgages backed by the companies could reach $448 billion, with a portion of that covered by reserves or assumed by outside parties. The CBO estimated the net costs to the government could top $370 billion by 2020. These are just estimates but what’s clear is that Fannie and Freddie are not cheap dependents and that’s why some argue that lawmakers should assess the potential costs of implicit government guarantees well before things go to pot.

“Their costs are largely unmeasured, unrecognized in the budget and unmanaged,” federal budget expert Marvin Phaup wrote in a recent paper. “A troubling aspect of current policy aimed at restarting the financial markets is the likely expansion of implied guarantees to include the obligations of additional private financial institutions.”

2. Social Security and Medicare Expenses are Unfunded
The governments’ accrued debt to the Social Security and Medicare trust funds is known but making those payments — which which will happen by 2037 for Social Security and within the next decade for Medicare –won’t be easy given the drop in federal revenue and the surge in government spending.

At that point, the programs will only be collecting enough in taxes to pay a portion of the benefits currently promised. There will be enormous pressure on the government to make up the difference, and Uncle Sam would have to borrow a lot of money to do so. Right now, money allocated to both entitlement programs is considered “mandatory” spending and therefore the spending increases for the programs are on autopilot and the financial commitment is uncapped in future years.

Some budget experts like Stuart Butler, vice president for domestic and economic policy at the conservative Heritage Foundation, would like to see the long-term obligations to Medicare and Social Security included in lawmakers’ annual consideration of the federal budget.

3. The True Cost of Tax Breaks
Everybody loves tax breaks and there’s more than a trillion dollars of them to love. That’s the amount of money the Treasury foregoes in annual revenue as a result of the many breaks in the tax code which effectively increases the government’s need to borrow.

This trillion-plus in tax breaks isn’t really up for consideration during annual budget discussions yet, while no one advocates abolishing tax breaks altogether many believe that tax breaks should be treated as discretionary spending. The idea is to bring them into the open so lawmakers can make a conscious decision annually about what they spend on tax breaks and recognize the costs associated with that decision.

4. Long-term Costs of New Roth IRA Rules
This year is the first year in which high-income investors with traditional IRAs or 401(k)s — both of which let savings grow tax-deferred until withdrawn — will have a chance to convert their accounts into Roth IRAs, where investments grow tax-free.

The new conversion rule is scored as a revenue raiser on the federal budget over the next decade because those who convert must pay the tax owed on their traditional IRA savings the year they convert but long-term it’s a different story. Since investments in the converted accounts will grow tax-free, Uncle Sam will collect considerably less revenue than he otherwise might have had the investors kept their ever-larger savings in a traditional IRA and paid taxes on them in retirement.

*http://www.financialarmageddon.com/2010/03/is-it-so-farfetched.html?
**http://money.cnn.com/2010/03/01/news/economy/budget_debt/index.htm

Editor’s Note:
- The above article consists of reformatted edited excerpts from the original for the sake of brevity, clarity and to ensure a fast and easy read. The author’s views and conclusions are unaltered.
- Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
- Sign up to receive every article posted via Twitter, Facebook, RSS feed or our Weekly Newsletter.
- Submit a comment. Share your views on the subject with all our readers.
- Buy the book below from Amazon. It’s pertinent to this article and inexpensive too.

Related Posts:

Short URL: http://www.munknee.com/?p=10400

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of munKNEE.com or any other munKNEE.com authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors or partners. Notices

Posted by on Apr 14 2010, With 0 Reads, Filed under Debts/Deficits. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Register and Top 40 Gold Stocks

COMMENTS

To post a comment, you must login using Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, or Hotmail in the box below.
Don't have a social network account? Register and Login direct with our site and post your comment.
Before you post, read our Comment Policy - Legal Notice


Comments Closed

Comments are closed

 

WHAT'S HOT

  1. Are You A Sucker? If Not, Here’s The Reality About America’s “Recovery”!
  2. First Extreme Sports – Now Extreme Investing: A Look at Leveraged ETFs
  3. Investing in Mutual Funds is a Loser’s Game! Here’s Why
  4. How Inflationary and Deflationary Outcomes Might Affect Your Bullion and Mining Shares
  5. U.S. Fiscal Situation MUCH Worse Than Government Lets On!
  6. Taking What Buffett Says Literally Would Hurt Your Portfolio Returns! Here’s Why
  7. Trading Using Technical Analysis is a Mug’s Game! Here’s Why
  8. Forget the EMH: Motivated Stock Pickers CAN Beat the Market!
  9. Invest in Natural Gas – Here’s How
  10. Gold: $3,000? $5,000? $10,000? These 151 Analysts Think So!
  11. Want to Invest In Agriculture? Here’s How – and Where
  12. von Greyerz: Expanding Central Bank Balance Sheets Guarantee Massively Higher Inflation & Gold/Silver Prices – Here’s Why
  13. David Nichols: Expect to See $2,750 – $3,000 Gold By June 2013 – Here’s Why
  14. The 5 Stages of Collapse: Where Are We Currently?
  15. Alf Field Sees Silver Reaching $158.34 Based on His $4,500 Gold Projection!
  16. U.S. Can NOT Avoid Coming Economic Collapse – No Matter What! Here’s Why
  17. Silver Will Go to $50 and Then Explode Dramatically Higher! Here’s Why
  18. Alf Field: Correction in Gold is OVER and on Way to $4,500+!
  19. These Major U.S. Companies On Verge Of Collapse
  20. Leeb: Gold Going to $3,000 Before the End of 2012!
  1. mygoldmygold: Wow…that’s a nice prediction…I don’t think we can predict 100% accurately...
  2. taluis: A punitive Sales or Capital Gains Tax on the sale of gold in an economic collapse (or similar situation) is...
  3. steviebee: But….if gold is going to $10,000, why should I only have “7 to 15% in Precious Metals”...
  4. GoldRate: it will be interesting to see if this triangle breaks up or down. We’ve had big volatility this week....
  5. Blindfolded Monkey: I don’t have quite the same negative view of Paul Krugman but I agree that it is clear that...


DISCLOSURE: It is our intent that all posts on this site be in accordance with the requirements, restrictions and terms of the Copyright Law of the United States and all other copyright treaties to which the United States is party and more specifically of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act - Blogger . As such, all posts on this website have been screened at Library of Congress Catalog as to their eligibility for posting. Should any post be deemed to be inadvertently in contravention of these Acts' terms please advise with substantiation of such apparent contravention (i.e. registration number) and the article in question will be immediately deleted from the site. Also, visit U.S. Code 17-107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights - Fair Use
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of financial, economic and investment issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER: Lorimer Wilson and Johnny Punish are not registered advisors and do not give investment advice per se. The articles to be found on the site are expressions of opinion only and should not be construed in any manner whatsoever as recommendations to buy or sell a stock, option, future, bond, commodity or any other financial instrument at any time. Please consult with a qualified investment advisor who is licensed by appropriate regulatory agencies in your legal jurisdiction before making any investment decisions, and barring that, we encourage you confirm the facts on your own before making important investment commitments. The information on this site was obtained from sources which we believe to be reliable, but we do not guarantee its accuracy. None of the information, advertisements, website links, or any opinions expressed constitutes a solicitation of the purchase or sale of any securities or commodities. Please note that while Wilson and Punish may already have invested or may from time to time invest in securities that are recommended or otherwise covered on this website they do not intend to disclose the extent of any current holdings or future transactions with respect to any particular security and, as such, you should consider this before investing in any security based upon statements and information contained in any report, post, comment or recommendation you read on the site.