Sign-up for Automatic Receipt of Articles
MUNKNEE ON : FACEBOOK | TWITTER
|

GDXJ Junior Gold Miner ETF: The Devil is in the Details

There has been a lot of investor interest in Van Eck Global’s Market Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) but the question is: will it live up to those lofty expectations? Words: 868

In further edited excerpts from the original article* Jeff Nielson (www.bullionbullscanada.com) goes on to say:

The GDXJ consists of 37 gold miners and prospectors with a weighted average market capitalization of only $850 million and a minimum cap of $150 million. The top 10 holdings, representing 46% in total, at its launch are:

Coeur d’Alene Mines (CDE), 6.6%
New Gold (NGD), 5.6%
Silver Standard Resources (SSRI), 5.4%
Hecla Mining (HL), 5.2%
Gammon Gold (GRS), 4.7%
Alamos Gold (AGI), 4.3%
Semafo (SMF.CN), 3.8%
Silvercorp Metals (SVM), 3.7%
European Goldfields (EGU), 3.4%
Golden Star Resources (GSS), 3.34%

Geographically, the portfolio is heavily tilted towarded Canadian-based companies at 62.6% with the U.S. and Australia far behind.

Here are some short-comings of the ETF:

1. Many Top-quality Gold Juniors do NOT Qualify for this Fund
The fund is not allowed to invest in any “junior” with a market cap of less than $150 million, with $200 million being the normal threshold. As such, thanks to the slaughter which these companies were subjected to in 2008/2009, dozens of top-quality gold juniors do not qualify for this fund – and this limits the selection available to the fund, although there are still many companies to choose from.

2. The Fund Invests in Mid-cap, NOT Small-cap Gold Miners
Also, contrary to the name of the fund, the fund will invest in mid-cap gold miners – with market caps in excess of $500 million. While there are some quality companies in this group, as well (with strong growth profiles), the inclusion of these larger companies will tend to reduce the up-side for this fund below what it would have been had the fund focused only on the small-caps.

3. Losses Can Exceed 100% of the Amount Invested
The “small print” in the prospectus also gives potential investors in this fund a good reason for worry: the intention of the fund to invest in “derivative” investments. This category of investments is described as “swaps, options, warrants, futures contracts, and currency forwards”. The prospectus warns that investments in these instruments could result in losses exceeding 100% of the amount invested!

4. Fund Overly Exposed to Derivatives
It gets worse. The fund intends to have at least 80% of its capital invested in the core assets around which the fund is based. However, this does not mean it will have at least 80% of those dollars invested in the shares of these companies. The company stated that these “derivatives” would be considered part of the core assets of this fund (meaning part of that 80% core). This means that theoretically the fund could hold 0% mining shares, and all derivative instruments. Obviously that is an extremely unlikely scenario. The point, however is that there is no possible excuse for deviating into these especially risky assets.

In Conclusion:
Apparently the people managing this fund don’t think that they can achieve a high enough return through investing in mining equities alone. This certainly suggests that this fund lacks the expertise to identify the best growth “stories” – and so wants to be able to attempt to “juice” returns through the same, Wall Street, Ponzi-like investments which have caused most of the problems in financial markets.

I had previously expressed personal interest in buying into this fund – as a relatively “safe” and diversified investment (within this sector). However, should the fund managers choose to invest heavily into derivative investments, the actual holdings of mining equities could be limited, and thus not offer an amount of diversification to justify experienced investors into putting money in this fund – and certainly the “safety” I had hoped for is also not present.

I would rather pick my own stocks one at a time, since I have no intention/desire to invest in the types of risky instruments in which this fund intends to dabble. I wish that I could be more enthusiastic in recommending this fund to investors.

“The devil is in the details,” goes the cliché – and certainly the managers of this fund have chosen to “make a deal with the devil.” People investing in precious metals are generally doing so to escape from the dubious (and often fraudulent) “exotic” financial products invented by the devious minds of Wall Street.

It would appear that this point is simply not understood by Van Eck. While the fund managers could choose to risk few of their investor dollars in derivative instruments, the fact that they will not commit themselves to more specific (and more responsible) guidelines for how and where they invest those dollars means that I have to reluctantly “pass” on investing in this fund.

For those investors who do buy in, I certainly wish you luck. However, I also advise you to keep a close watch on exactly what assets are held in this fund. Should the actual holdings in mining company shares not come very close to the 80% “core” in this fund, I would urge investors to seek other options for their precious metals investments.

*http://seekingalpha.com/article/172870-van-eck-s-new-junior-gold-miner-etf-a-preliminary-analysis

Editor’s Note:
- The above article consists of reformatted edited excerpts from the original for the sake of brevity, clarity and to ensure a fast and easy read. The author’s views and conclusions are unaltered.
- Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
- Sign up to receive every article posted via Twitter, Facebook, RSS feed or our Weekly Newsletter.
- Submit a comment. Share your views on the subject with all our readers.
- Buy the book below from Amazon. It’s pertinent to this article and inexpensive too.

Related Posts:

Short URL: http://www.munknee.com/?p=1839

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of munKNEE.com or any other munKNEE.com authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors or partners. Notices

Posted by on May 4 2010, With 0 Reads, Filed under Gold/Silver, Mutual/ETFunds. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Register and Top 40 Gold Stocks

COMMENTS

To post a comment, you must login using Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, or Hotmail in the box below.
Don't have a social network account? Register and Login direct with our site and post your comment.
Before you post, read our Comment Policy - Legal Notice


Comments Closed

Comments are closed

 

WHAT'S HOT

  1. von Greyerz: Expanding Central Bank Balance Sheets Guarantee Massively Higher Inflation & Gold/Silver Prices – Here’s Why
  2. American Grads: Here’s a Great Guide to Personal Finance
  3. David Nichols: Expect to See $2,750 – $3,000 Gold By June 2013 – Here’s Why
  4. The 5 Stages of Collapse: Where Are We Currently?
  5. Alf Field Sees Silver Reaching $158.34 Based on His $4,500 Gold Projection!
  6. The GOOD, the BAD, and the Downright UGLY Factors Affecting the USD!
  7. S&P 500 Should Continue Climbing Until October and Then Decline 15-30%! – Here’s Why
  8. U.S. House Prices Have MUCH Further To Fall! Here’s Why
  9. U.S. Can NOT Avoid Coming Economic Collapse – No Matter What! Here’s Why
  10. Leeb: Gold Going to $3,000 Before the End of 2012!
  11. Creating More Inflation is Now the Official Policy of the Fed
  12. Ground Level Insights Into the “China Condition”
  13. Bock and Rickards Agree: Governments Want Gold to Go Higher!
  14. Williams STILL Believes a Hyperinflationary Great Depression is Coming! Here’s Why
  15. Governments Will Want – Will NEED – Much Higher Gold Prices! Here’s Why
  16. These Major U.S. Companies On Verge Of Collapse
  17. It’s Time to Buy Gold/Silver, Hide It, and Wait For the Smoke to Clear! Here’s Why
  18. Silver Will Go to $50 and Then Explode Dramatically Higher! Here’s Why
  19. Alf Field: Correction in Gold is OVER and on Way to $4,500+!
  20. Why Did the Baltic Dry Index Collapse? Here’s Why
  1. mygoldmygold: Wow…that’s a nice prediction…I don’t think we can predict 100% accurately...
  2. taluis: A punitive Sales or Capital Gains Tax on the sale of gold in an economic collapse (or similar situation) is...
  3. steviebee: But….if gold is going to $10,000, why should I only have “7 to 15% in Precious Metals”...
  4. GoldRate: it will be interesting to see if this triangle breaks up or down. We’ve had big volatility this week....
  5. Blindfolded Monkey: I don’t have quite the same negative view of Paul Krugman but I agree that it is clear that...


DISCLOSURE: It is our intent that all posts on this site be in accordance with the requirements, restrictions and terms of the Copyright Law of the United States and all other copyright treaties to which the United States is party and more specifically of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act - Blogger . As such, all posts on this website have been screened at Library of Congress Catalog as to their eligibility for posting. Should any post be deemed to be inadvertently in contravention of these Acts' terms please advise with substantiation of such apparent contravention (i.e. registration number) and the article in question will be immediately deleted from the site. Also, visit U.S. Code 17-107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights - Fair Use
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of financial, economic and investment issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER: Lorimer Wilson and Johnny Punish are not registered advisors and do not give investment advice per se. The articles to be found on the site are expressions of opinion only and should not be construed in any manner whatsoever as recommendations to buy or sell a stock, option, future, bond, commodity or any other financial instrument at any time. Please consult with a qualified investment advisor who is licensed by appropriate regulatory agencies in your legal jurisdiction before making any investment decisions, and barring that, we encourage you confirm the facts on your own before making important investment commitments. The information on this site was obtained from sources which we believe to be reliable, but we do not guarantee its accuracy. None of the information, advertisements, website links, or any opinions expressed constitutes a solicitation of the purchase or sale of any securities or commodities. Please note that while Wilson and Punish may already have invested or may from time to time invest in securities that are recommended or otherwise covered on this website they do not intend to disclose the extent of any current holdings or future transactions with respect to any particular security and, as such, you should consider this before investing in any security based upon statements and information contained in any report, post, comment or recommendation you read on the site.