Sign-up for Automatic Receipt of Articles
MUNKNEE ON : FACEBOOK | TWITTER
|

Nouriel Roubini: How to Avoid a Double-Dip Global Recession

There is an ongoing debate among global policymakers about when and how fast to exit from the strong monetary and fiscal stimulus that prevented the Great Recession of 2008-2009 from turning into a new Great Depression. Germany and the European Central Bank are pushing aggressively for early fiscal austerity; the United States is worried about the risks of excessively early fiscal consolidation. Words: 957

Lorimer Wilson, editor of www.FinancialArticleSummariesToday.com, provides below further reformatted and edited excerpts from Nouriel Roubini’s (www.project-syndicate.org) original article* for the sake of clarity and brevity to ensure a fast and easy read. Roubini goes on to say:

Policymakers are damned if they do and damned if they don’t
If they take away the monetary and fiscal stimulus too soon – when private demand remains shaky – there is a risk of falling back into recession and deflation. While fiscal austerity may be necessary in countries with large deficits and debt, raising taxes and cutting government spending may make the recession and deflation worse.

On the other hand, if policymakers maintain the stimulus for too long, runaway fiscal deficits may lead to a sovereign debt crisis (markets are already punishing fiscally undisciplined countries with larger sovereign spreads). Or, if these deficits are monetized, high inflation may force up long-term interest rates and again choke off economic recovery.

The problem is compounded by the fact that, for the last decade, the U.S. and other deficit countries – including the United Kingdom, Spain, Greece, Portugal, Ireland, Iceland, Dubai, and Australia – have been consumers of first and last resort, spending more than their income and running current-account deficits. Meanwhile, emerging Asian economies – particularly China – together with Japan, Germany, and a few other countries have been the producers of first and last resort, spending less than their income and running current-account surpluses.

Overspending countries are now retrenching, owing to the need to reduce their private and public spending, to import less, and to reduce their external deficits and deleverage. But if the deficit countries spend less while the surplus countries don’t compensate by savings less and spending more – especially on private and public consumption – then excess productive capacity will meet a lack of aggregate demand, leading to another slump in global economic growth.

What should policymakers do?
1. In countries where early fiscal austerity is necessary to prevent a fiscal crisis, monetary policy should be much easier – via lower policy rates and more quantitative easing – to compensate for the recessionary and deflationary effects of fiscal tightening. In general, near-zero policy rates should be maintained in most advanced economies to support the economic recovery.

2. Countries where bond-market vigilantes have not yet awakened – the U.S., the U.K., and Japan – should maintain their fiscal stimulus while designing credible fiscal consolidation plans to be implemented later over the medium term.

3. Over-saving countries like China and emerging Asia, Germany, and Japan should implement policies that reduce their savings and current-account surpluses. Specifically, China and emerging Asia should implement reforms that reduce the need for precautionary savings and let their currencies appreciate; Germany should maintain its fiscal stimulus and extend it into 2011, rather than starting its ill-conceived fiscal austerity now; and Japan should pursue measures to reduce its current-account surplus and stimulate real incomes and consumption.

4. Countries with current-account surpluses should let their undervalued currencies appreciate, while the ECB should follow an easier monetary policy that accommodates a gradual further weakening of the euro to restore competiveness and growth in the eurozone.

5. In countries where private-sector deleveraging is very rapid via a fall in private consumption and private investment, the fiscal stimulus should be maintained and extended, as long as financial markets do not perceive those deficits as unsustainable.

6. While regulatory reform that increases the liquidity and capital ratios for financial institutions is necessary, those higher ratios should be phased in gradually to prevent a further worsening of the credit crunch.

7. In countries where private and public debt levels are unsustainable – household debt in countries where the housing boom has gone bust and debts of governments, like Greece’s, that suffer from insolvency rather than just illiquidity – liabilities should be restructured and reduced to prevent a severe debt deflation and contraction of spending.

8. The International Monetary Fund, the European Union, and other multilateral institutions should provide generous lender-of-last-resort support in order to prevent a severe deflationary recession in countries that need private and public deleveraging.

9. In general, deleveraging by households, governments, and financial institutions should be gradual – and supported by currency weakening – if we are to avoid a double-dip recession and a worsening of deflation.

10. Countries that can still afford fiscal stimulus and need to reduce their savings and increase spending should contribute to the global current-account adjustment – via currency adjustments and expenditure increases – in order to prevent a global shortage of aggregate demand.

Failure to implement such coordinated policy measures – to sustain global aggregate demand at a time when deflationary trends are still severe in advanced economies – could lead to a very dangerous and damaging double-dip recession in advanced economies. Such an outcome would cause another bout of severe systemic risk in global financial markets, trigger a series of contagious sovereign defaults, and severely damage the growth prospects of emerging-market economies that have so far experienced a more robust recovery than advanced countries.

*http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/roubini26/English

Editor’s Note:
- The above article consists of reformatted edited excerpts from the original for the sake of brevity, clarity and to ensure a fast and easy read. The author’s views and conclusions are unaltered.
- Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
- Sign up to receive every article posted via Twitter, Facebook, RSS feed or our Weekly Newsletter.

Related Posts:

Short URL: http://www.munknee.com/?p=12449

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of munKNEE.com or any other munKNEE.com authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors or partners. Notices

Posted by on Jun 23 2010, With 0 Reads, Filed under Economy. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Register and Top 40 Gold Stocks

COMMENTS

To post a comment, you must login using Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, or Hotmail in the box below.
Don't have a social network account? Register and Login direct with our site and post your comment.
Before you post, read our Comment Policy - Legal Notice


Comments Closed

Comments are closed

 

WHAT'S HOT

  1. Are You A Sucker? If Not, Here’s The Reality About America’s “Recovery”!
  2. First Extreme Sports – Now Extreme Investing: A Look at Leveraged ETFs
  3. Investing in Mutual Funds is a Loser’s Game! Here’s Why
  4. How Inflationary and Deflationary Outcomes Might Affect Your Bullion and Mining Shares
  5. U.S. Fiscal Situation MUCH Worse Than Government Lets On!
  6. Taking What Buffett Says Literally Would Hurt Your Portfolio Returns! Here’s Why
  7. Trading Using Technical Analysis is a Mug’s Game! Here’s Why
  8. Forget the EMH: Motivated Stock Pickers CAN Beat the Market!
  9. Invest in Natural Gas – Here’s How
  10. Gold: $3,000? $5,000? $10,000? These 151 Analysts Think So!
  11. Want to Invest In Agriculture? Here’s How – and Where
  12. von Greyerz: Expanding Central Bank Balance Sheets Guarantee Massively Higher Inflation & Gold/Silver Prices – Here’s Why
  13. David Nichols: Expect to See $2,750 – $3,000 Gold By June 2013 – Here’s Why
  14. The 5 Stages of Collapse: Where Are We Currently?
  15. Alf Field Sees Silver Reaching $158.34 Based on His $4,500 Gold Projection!
  16. U.S. Can NOT Avoid Coming Economic Collapse – No Matter What! Here’s Why
  17. Silver Will Go to $50 and Then Explode Dramatically Higher! Here’s Why
  18. Alf Field: Correction in Gold is OVER and on Way to $4,500+!
  19. These Major U.S. Companies On Verge Of Collapse
  20. Leeb: Gold Going to $3,000 Before the End of 2012!
  1. mygoldmygold: Wow…that’s a nice prediction…I don’t think we can predict 100% accurately...
  2. taluis: A punitive Sales or Capital Gains Tax on the sale of gold in an economic collapse (or similar situation) is...
  3. steviebee: But….if gold is going to $10,000, why should I only have “7 to 15% in Precious Metals”...
  4. GoldRate: it will be interesting to see if this triangle breaks up or down. We’ve had big volatility this week....
  5. Blindfolded Monkey: I don’t have quite the same negative view of Paul Krugman but I agree that it is clear that...


DISCLOSURE: It is our intent that all posts on this site be in accordance with the requirements, restrictions and terms of the Copyright Law of the United States and all other copyright treaties to which the United States is party and more specifically of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act - Blogger . As such, all posts on this website have been screened at Library of Congress Catalog as to their eligibility for posting. Should any post be deemed to be inadvertently in contravention of these Acts' terms please advise with substantiation of such apparent contravention (i.e. registration number) and the article in question will be immediately deleted from the site. Also, visit U.S. Code 17-107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights - Fair Use
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of financial, economic and investment issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER: Lorimer Wilson and Johnny Punish are not registered advisors and do not give investment advice per se. The articles to be found on the site are expressions of opinion only and should not be construed in any manner whatsoever as recommendations to buy or sell a stock, option, future, bond, commodity or any other financial instrument at any time. Please consult with a qualified investment advisor who is licensed by appropriate regulatory agencies in your legal jurisdiction before making any investment decisions, and barring that, we encourage you confirm the facts on your own before making important investment commitments. The information on this site was obtained from sources which we believe to be reliable, but we do not guarantee its accuracy. None of the information, advertisements, website links, or any opinions expressed constitutes a solicitation of the purchase or sale of any securities or commodities. Please note that while Wilson and Punish may already have invested or may from time to time invest in securities that are recommended or otherwise covered on this website they do not intend to disclose the extent of any current holdings or future transactions with respect to any particular security and, as such, you should consider this before investing in any security based upon statements and information contained in any report, post, comment or recommendation you read on the site.