Sign-up for Automatic Receipt of Articles
MUNKNEE ON : FACEBOOK | TWITTER
|

Relax! Inflation or Deflation Will Be Mild for Next Few Years – and Then…

There is no reason for investors to be worried about either inflation or deflation in the United States for at least the next few years. Words: 933

So says Martin Feldstein in an article* entitled “Inflation or Deflation?” at http://biz.thestar.com. Below Lorimer Wilson, editor of www.FinancialArticleSummariesToday.com, presents further reformatted and edited [..] excerpts from the article for the sake of clarity and brevity to ensure a fast and easy read. (Please note that this paragraph must be included in any article reposting to avoid copyright infringement.) Feldstein goes on to say:

The Case Against Inflation
America’s high rate of unemployment and low rates of capacity utilisation imply that there is little upward pressure on wages and prices in the U.S. and the recent rise in the value of the dollar relative to the euro and the British pound helps by reducing import costs.

Those who emphasise the risk of inflation often point to America’s enormous budget deficit. The Congressional Budget Office projects that the country’s fiscal deficit will average 5% of gross domestic product (GDP) for the rest of the decade, driving government debt to 90% of GDP, from less than 60% of GDP in 2009. While those large fiscal deficits will be a major problem for the U.S. economy if nothing is done to bring them down, they need not be inflationary.

Sustained budget deficits crowd out private investment, push up long-term real interest rates and increase the burden on future taxpayers but they do not cause inflation unless they lead to excess demand for goods and labour. The last time the U.S. faced large budget deficits, in the early 1980s, inflation declined sharply because of a tight monetary policy. Europe and Japan now have both large fiscal deficits and low inflation.

The inflation pessimists worry that the government will actually choose a policy of faster price growth to reduce the real value of the government debt but such a strategy can work only in countries where the duration of the government’s debt is long and the interest rate on that debt is fixed. That is because an increase in the inflation rate causes interest rates on new debt to rise by an equal amount. The resulting higher interest payments add to the national debt, offsetting the erosion of the real value of the existing debt caused by the higher inflation.

In the current situation, the U.S. cannot reduce the real value of its government debt significantly by indulging in a bout of inflation, because the average maturity on existing debt is very short – only about four years. Furthermore, the projected fiscal deficits imply that the additional debt that will be issued during the next decade will be as large as the total stock of debt today. So raising inflation is no cure for the government’s current debt or future deficits.

The Case Against Deflation
Those who worry about deflation note that the U.S. consumer price index (CPI) has not increased at all in the past three months. Won’t that continue and feed on itself – as it has in Japan – as consumers delay spending in anticipation of even lower prices in the future? Also, doesn’t Japan’s persistent deflation since the early 1990s also show that, once it begins, deflation cannot be reversed by a policy of easy money or fiscal deficits?

[No, that's not the case with the U.S.] The recent weakness in U.S. prices is very different from the situation that prevails in Japan. Zero inflation for the past three months has been a one-time event driven by the fall in energy prices. The other broad components of the CPI have increased in recent month, and the CPI is up about two percentage points over the past 12 months. Moreover, surveys of consumer expectations show that U.S. households expect prices to rise at more than 2% in both the coming year and the more distant future. That expected inflation rate is consistent with the difference in interest rates between ordinary U.S. government bonds and Treasury Inflation Protected Securities [TIPS]. With such expectations, consumers have no reason to put off purchases.

A second reason for relatively low inflation in recent years has been a temporary fall in the cost of production. As firms shed workers during the economic downturn, output fell more slowly. The resulting rise in output per worker, together with slow wage growth, reduced unit labour costs. That process is now coming to an end as employment rises.

Conclusion
The good news is that: the possibility of significant inflation or deflation during the next few years is low on the list of economic risks faced by the U.S. economy and by financial investors.

[The bad news is that:] bond prices show that investors apparently expect inflation to remain low for 10 years and beyond, and that they also do not require higher interest rates as compensation for the risk that the fiscal deficit will cause real interest rates to rise in the future. [That's just not realistic!]

* http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2010/6/26/business/6551926&sec=business (Martin Feldstein, a professor of economics at Harvard, was chairman of President Ronald Reagan’s Council of Economic Advisors and president of the National Bureau for Economic Research.)

Editor’s Note:
- The above article consists of reformatted edited excerpts from the original for the sake of brevity, clarity and to ensure a fast and easy read. The author’s views and conclusions are unaltered.
- Permission to reprint in whole or in part is permitted provided full credit is given.
- Sign up to receive every article posted via Twitter, Facebook or RSS feed.
- Subscribe to our Weekly Newsletter.
- Submit a comment. Share your views on the subject with all our readers.

Related Posts:

Short URL: http://www.munknee.com/?p=12569

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of munKNEE.com or any other munKNEE.com authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors or partners. Notices

Posted by on Aug 12 2010, With 0 Reads, Filed under Economy, Inflation/Deflation. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Register and Top 40 Gold Stocks

COMMENTS

To post a comment, you must login using Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, or Hotmail in the box below.
Don't have a social network account? Register and Login direct with our site and post your comment.
Before you post, read our Comment Policy - Legal Notice


Comments Closed

Comments are closed

 

WHAT'S HOT

  1. von Greyerz: Expanding Central Bank Balance Sheets Guarantee Massively Higher Inflation & Gold/Silver Prices – Here’s Why
  2. American Grads: Here’s a Great Guide to Personal Finance
  3. David Nichols: Expect to See $2,750 – $3,000 Gold By June 2013 – Here’s Why
  4. The 5 Stages of Collapse: Where Are We Currently?
  5. Alf Field Sees Silver Reaching $158.34 Based on His $4,500 Gold Projection!
  6. The GOOD, the BAD, and the Downright UGLY Factors Affecting the USD!
  7. S&P 500 Should Continue Climbing Until October and Then Decline 15-30%! – Here’s Why
  8. U.S. House Prices Have MUCH Further To Fall! Here’s Why
  9. U.S. Can NOT Avoid Coming Economic Collapse – No Matter What! Here’s Why
  10. Leeb: Gold Going to $3,000 Before the End of 2012!
  11. Creating More Inflation is Now the Official Policy of the Fed
  12. Ground Level Insights Into the “China Condition”
  13. Bock and Rickards Agree: Governments Want Gold to Go Higher!
  14. Williams STILL Believes a Hyperinflationary Great Depression is Coming! Here’s Why
  15. Governments Will Want – Will NEED – Much Higher Gold Prices! Here’s Why
  16. These Major U.S. Companies On Verge Of Collapse
  17. It’s Time to Buy Gold/Silver, Hide It, and Wait For the Smoke to Clear! Here’s Why
  18. Silver Will Go to $50 and Then Explode Dramatically Higher! Here’s Why
  19. Alf Field: Correction in Gold is OVER and on Way to $4,500+!
  20. Why Did the Baltic Dry Index Collapse? Here’s Why
  1. mygoldmygold: Wow…that’s a nice prediction…I don’t think we can predict 100% accurately...
  2. taluis: A punitive Sales or Capital Gains Tax on the sale of gold in an economic collapse (or similar situation) is...
  3. steviebee: But….if gold is going to $10,000, why should I only have “7 to 15% in Precious Metals”...
  4. GoldRate: it will be interesting to see if this triangle breaks up or down. We’ve had big volatility this week....
  5. Blindfolded Monkey: I don’t have quite the same negative view of Paul Krugman but I agree that it is clear that...


DISCLOSURE: It is our intent that all posts on this site be in accordance with the requirements, restrictions and terms of the Copyright Law of the United States and all other copyright treaties to which the United States is party and more specifically of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act - Blogger . As such, all posts on this website have been screened at Library of Congress Catalog as to their eligibility for posting. Should any post be deemed to be inadvertently in contravention of these Acts' terms please advise with substantiation of such apparent contravention (i.e. registration number) and the article in question will be immediately deleted from the site. Also, visit U.S. Code 17-107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights - Fair Use
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of financial, economic and investment issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER: Lorimer Wilson and Johnny Punish are not registered advisors and do not give investment advice per se. The articles to be found on the site are expressions of opinion only and should not be construed in any manner whatsoever as recommendations to buy or sell a stock, option, future, bond, commodity or any other financial instrument at any time. Please consult with a qualified investment advisor who is licensed by appropriate regulatory agencies in your legal jurisdiction before making any investment decisions, and barring that, we encourage you confirm the facts on your own before making important investment commitments. The information on this site was obtained from sources which we believe to be reliable, but we do not guarantee its accuracy. None of the information, advertisements, website links, or any opinions expressed constitutes a solicitation of the purchase or sale of any securities or commodities. Please note that while Wilson and Punish may already have invested or may from time to time invest in securities that are recommended or otherwise covered on this website they do not intend to disclose the extent of any current holdings or future transactions with respect to any particular security and, as such, you should consider this before investing in any security based upon statements and information contained in any report, post, comment or recommendation you read on the site.