Monday , 24 June 2019

# Alf Field Sees Silver Reaching \$158.34 Based on His \$4,500 Gold Projection!

This article was prompted by a question enquiring what the silver price might be if my gold forecast of \$4,500 proved to be correct [see my article entitled “Alf Field: Correction in Gold is OVER and On Way to \$4,500+!” and I have settled on] a target price of \$158.34 for silver. [Let me explain how I came to that specific price.] Words: 850

So says Alf Field in edited excerpts from his original article*.

###### Lorimer Wilson, editor of www.FinancialArticleSummariesToday.com (A site for sore eyes and inquisitive minds) and www.munKNEE.com (Your Key to Making Money!) has edited ([ ]), abridged (…) and reformatted (some sub-titles and bold/italics emphases) the article below for the sake of clarity and brevity to ensure a fast and easy read. The article’s views and conclusions are unaltered and no personal comments have been included to maintain the integrity of the original article. Please note that this paragraph must be included in any article re-posting to avoid copyright infringement.

Field goes on to say, in part:

The quick answer to the question of what the silver price will be when gold gets to \$4,500 is to pick your favorite silver/gold ratio and divide it into \$4500. The current ratio incidentally is about 51. If you choose the lowest ratio achieved since 2001 of 32 that would produce a silver price of around \$140 (\$4500 divided by 32).

This is not a satisfactory answer, so I decided to approach the Elliott Wave analysis of silver from a different angle. Instead of working upwards using the analysis of the minor waves, which was the technique used in the gold calculations, what if we worked backwards in silver starting with the larger waves?

Gold and silver tend to move in tandem, not in an exact synchronization, but enough to suggest that the Major waves of both metals should coincide from a time perspective. We know that in gold the Major ONE wave peaked in March 2008 at \$1003 and that Major TWO declined to \$680 in November 2008.

Silver also had a peak in March 2008 at \$20.68 and declined to an important low of \$8.77 in November 2008. If we assumed that the peak at \$20.68 in March 2008 was the end of Major ONE and the decline to \$8.77 the end of Major TWO, how would the various percentages work out? When I did these calculations I was astonished at the relationships and wave counts that emerged.

The chart below is the monthly spot silver price shown in log scale so that the percentage changes are visible. The bull market started in November 2001 at a price of \$4.02. From that point to the suggested peak of Major ONE at \$20.68 there are five clear waves visible, marked 1-2-3-4-5. The prices at the various turning points are also displayed.

It is evident from the above chart that silver has completed the same shaped bull market as gold has and that it is at the same stage in its development. Thus silver has probably also completed the first intermediate up wave of Major THREE, in this case from \$8.77 to \$49.52, a gain of +\$40.75 or +464% and has also completed intermediate wave 2 of Major THREE, being the decline from \$49.52 to \$26.39 or -47%.

How does this decline of -47% measure up in terms of EW relationships? As with gold, where the corrections in Major THREE were shown to be larger than the corrections in Major ONE, the same applies to silver. The corrections in Major ONE shown in the chart above were close to -34%. If we multiply 34% by another Fibonacci relationship of 1.382 we get 47%! This is mind-blowing stuff for an analyst who did not believe that EW applied to silver!

Silver, as with gold, is starting intermediate wave 3 of Major THREE, which should be the longest and strongest wave in the bull market. It should certainly be longer than intermediate wave 1 which was the gain from \$8.77 to \$49.52, or +464%, as shown above.

Thus the gain in wave 3 of Major THREE should be larger than +464%. It should be a gain of at least 500%. Starting from the \$26.39 low, a gain of 500% would produce a target price of \$158.34 for silver. That is the number which equates with the \$4500 price forecast for gold and produces a silver to gold ratio of 28.4 (\$4500 divided by 158.34).

The gain in gold was forecast to be 200% for this move while the forecast rise in the silver price is 500%. Silver is again predicted to perform better than gold based on these EW calculations.

A word of caution is appropriate at this stage. All EW studies are based on probabilities. While the wave counts may provide a high degree of confidence in the forecasts, one cannot be 100% certain of any forecast. It is necessary to have a point at which it is obvious that the forecasts are wrong. In the case of this silver study, the line in the sand is at \$26.00. If the silver price drops below \$26.00 the odds are that the above calculations will not work out…

Related Articles:

1. Silver Will Go to \$50 and Then Explode Dramatically Higher! Here’s Why

There is a massive amount of energy underlying the silver market, and when it is ready to unleash, we will see price/value increases that will stun even the most ardent silverbugs…The real power of this expected move is likely to be released only some time after the price of silver has surpassed the \$50/ozt. level. [Let me explain.] Words: 685

2. Goldrunner: Gold, Silver and HUI Index to Bounce Back to Major Highs by May 2012

With the present major correction in gold, silver and the mining sector it is important to look at the big picture and see what the charts are saying from a technical fractal relationship with what happened back in 1979 when the last truely major bull run occurred. To date the situation is, frankly, no different than it was back then unfolding just as it should. As a result we can expect MAJOR upward price action in physical gold and silver and in their mining (producers, developers, explorers and royalty streamers alike) in the next few months on their way to their respective parabolic peaks in the years ahead. Read on. Words: 1604

3. SILVER is Ready for Take Off! These 7 Charts Show Why

After a very turbulent year, silver now looks set to take off again. The best entry point of the last 5 years was in 2008… and currently we are in a similar situation, which means that silver…is ready for take-off. In this article I will tell you why I think [that is the case illustrating my views with the use of 7 charts]. Words: 1200

4. What Do Gold Measurements “Troy” Ounce and “Karat” Really Mean?

You have no doubt read countless articles on the price of gold costing x dollars per “troy ounce” or perhaps just x dollars per “ounce” but the difference between the two measurements is significant. For that matter, what’s the difference between a 24 karat gold ring and an 18 karat gold ring? Let me explain. Words: 863

5. Silver: The Party Isn’t Over Yet

Investing is often a study of inconsistencies and contradictions. If it weren’t, the markets would be a simple game and there would no back and forth between buyers and sellers, greed and fear and technical analysts, fundamentalists and momentum players. Our experience with silver since the end of last year illustrates this [but] we [still] think it makes sense to get exposure to the metal. [Let us explain.] Words: 820

6.  History Says Silver Could Become the Next 10-Bagger Investment! Here’s Why

If you concur with the 159 analysts (see below) that maintain that physical gold is going to go parabolic in price in the next few years to \$3,000, \$5,000 or even \$10,000 or more then you should seriously consider buying physical silver. Why? Because the historical gold:silver ratio is so way out of wack that silver should appreciate much more than gold as it goes parabolic in the years to come. Indeed, silver could easily reach \$100 – \$200 per troy ounce, maybe even \$300 and conceivably in excess of \$400 depending on how high gold goes. The aforementioned may be hard to believe but an analysis below of the historical price relationship between silver and gold suggests that such will most likely occur if gold does, indeed, go parabolic. Take a look. Words: 1423