So writes Louis Basenese (www.wallstreetdaily.com) in edited excerpts from his original article* entitled Beware of This Insidious New Currency Scam.
This post is presented by Lorimer Wilson, editor of www.FinancialArticleSummariesToday.com and www.munKNEE.com and the FREE Intelligence Report newsletter (see sample here – register here) and may have been edited ([ ]), abridged (…) and/or reformatted (some sub-titles and bold/italics emphases) for the sake of clarity and brevity to ensure a fast and easy read. This paragraph must be included in any article re-posting to avoid copyright infringement.
Submit your own articles & article suggestions for posting consideration
Register to receive our FREE Market Intelligence Report newsletter
Basenese goes on to say in further edited excerpts:
Bitcoin was envisioned in a 2008 paper by the pseudonymous developer, Satoshi Nakamoto, and launched in 2010. It’s essentially a peer-to-peer electronic cash system that can be transferred through a computer or smartphone without an intermediate financial institution. That sounds incredibly interesting but…it is nothing beyond that of a curiosity. Any talk about Bitcoin being a potential alternative currency is a function of desperation, not rational thinking – even if it keeps garnering more and more notable support.
Last week, BitPay – an Atlanta-based startup that processes payments merchants receive in Bitcoins – secured $2 million from a venture capital firm backed by PayPal’s founders and a few weeks before that, Coinbase, an 11-month-old startup that also facilitates Bitcoin transactions, secured $5 million in capital from another Silicon Valley heavy-hitter, Union Square Ventures.
Despite such strong votes of confidence, though, Bitcoin stands zero chance of being a legitimate, widely adopted currency. Here are three key reasons why:
~Bitcoin Pitfall #1: In God Nobody We Trust
No doubt, the atheists who cringe over the fact that U.S. paper money says “In God We Trust” love the fact that Bitcoins pledge no such allegiance. In fact, many supporters of the digital currency tout the lack of any centralization or regulation over Bitcoin as a key selling point. Combine that with a finite supply of Bitcoins (21 million), and it seems like no government can inflate the currency.
I’ll concede that a world without inflation would be wonderful and Bitcoin is set up to make that a possibility but, without regulation, and the guidelines and legal protections that come with it, consumers have no reason to trust the currency – and if we can’t put our trust in a currency, we won’t use it. Simple as that. Furthermore, if you think governments around the world are going to sit on the sidelines and allow an unregulated, digital currency to gain momentum, you’re crazy.
The Department of Homeland Security has already dropped the hammer on Mt. Gox, the world’s largest Bitcoin exchange, for operating a money-transmitting business without a license – and that’s only a preview of what’s to come so this whole notion of an unregulated currency is really just a pipe dream. While citizens might want it, world governments won’t allow it. Whether or not that’s fair doesn’t matter. It’s reality.
~Bitcoin Pitfall #2: No Guarantees
In addition to lacking trust, we have no guarantee that Bitcoin won’t be replaced. I mean, what’s going to stop a better Bitcoin from coming onto the scene? If the limited supply drives up prices to untenable levels, there’s nothing to stop the creators from simply creating more Bitcoins. They say they won’t. But do you actually trust them? Put another way, would you be willing to accept your next paycheck in Bitcoins? Yeah, I didn’t think so.
~Bitcoin Pitfall #3: No Inherent Value
Haters continually deride the U.S. dollar because it’s not backed by anything of value. What’s the difference with Bitcoin? Just like there’s no inherent value in paper, there’s no inherent value in a bunch of ones and zeros in cyberspace. That means there’s no way to figure out what a fair price is for a Bitcoin – and that’s ultimately the digital currency’s undoing. It’s nothing more than a speculation – and a wild one, at that.
When Bitcoin first hit the market, it had little to no value but the price of each coin quickly soared above $25. Then it collapsed back to $5 again. After a slow and steady recovery, prices zoomed above $250 in the wake of the asset seizure in Cyprus and, sure enough, they cratered back down to Earth again. Notice a pattern? I’m sorry, but people want a currency with a stable value, and that’s something Bitcoin simply can’t offer.
The only reason people won’t stop talking about Bitcoin is because of the chart above. Forget its “sound theoretical underpinnings,” as Henry Blodget of Business Insider notes. Greed is what’s driving interest right now.
Investors see an opportunity to make a quick buck on a far-fetched “asset,” just like they’ve been doing for centuries. Tulip bulbs, anyone? The fringe set of retailers that accept Bitcoins are no different. They like the currency because it allows them to avoid interchange fees and it also immunizes them to the risk of chargebacks. (Like cash transactions, Bitcoin payments can’t be reversed.) In other words, it lines retailers’ pockets with more money.
Ultimately, it’s greed – not a genuine interest in a fundamentally stronger alternative to the status quo – that’s driving Bitcoin prices so forget Bitcoin being a contender as an alternative currency. At best, it’s a speculative investment, and a very speculative one at that.
Ahead of the tape,
(Editor’s Note: The author’s views and conclusions in the above article are unaltered and no personal comments have been included to maintain the integrity of the original post. Furthermore, the views, conclusions and any recommendations offered in this article are not to be construed as an endorsement of such by the editor.)
Bitcoin is the first peer-to-peer (P2P) digital currency and payment system to gain significant interest. This month its marketcap surpassed $1 billion. [Below is a description of what Bitcoin is, and isn’t, and why it has caught on to the extent it has.] Read More »