There is no reason for investors to be worried about either inflation or deflation in the United States for at least the next few years. Words: 933
So says Martin Feldstein in an article* entitled “Inflation or Deflation?” at http://biz.thestar.com. Below Lorimer Wilson, editor of www.FinancialArticleSummariesToday.com, presents further reformatted and edited [..] excerpts from the article for the sake of clarity and brevity to ensure a fast and easy read. (Please note that this paragraph must be included in any article reposting to avoid copyright infringement.) Feldstein goes on to say:
The Case Against Inflation
America’s high rate of unemployment and low rates of capacity utilisation imply that there is little upward pressure on wages and prices in the U.S. and the recent rise in the value of the dollar relative to the euro and the British pound helps by reducing import costs.
Those who emphasise the risk of inflation often point to America’s enormous budget deficit. The Congressional Budget Office projects that the country’s fiscal deficit will average 5% of gross domestic product (GDP) for the rest of the decade, driving government debt to 90% of GDP, from less than 60% of GDP in 2009. While those large fiscal deficits will be a major problem for the U.S. economy if nothing is done to bring them down, they need not be inflationary.
Sustained budget deficits crowd out private investment, push up long-term real interest rates and increase the burden on future taxpayers but they do not cause inflation unless they lead to excess demand for goods and labour. The last time the U.S. faced large budget deficits, in the early 1980s, inflation declined sharply because of a tight monetary policy. Europe and Japan now have both large fiscal deficits and low inflation.
The inflation pessimists worry that the government will actually choose a policy of faster price growth to reduce the real value of the government debt but such a strategy can work only in countries where the duration of the government’s debt is long and the interest rate on that debt is fixed. That is because an increase in the inflation rate causes interest rates on new debt to rise by an equal amount. The resulting higher interest payments add to the national debt, offsetting the erosion of the real value of the existing debt caused by the higher inflation.
In the current situation, the U.S. cannot reduce the real value of its government debt significantly by indulging in a bout of inflation, because the average maturity on existing debt is very short – only about four years. Furthermore, the projected fiscal deficits imply that the additional debt that will be issued during the next decade will be as large as the total stock of debt today. So raising inflation is no cure for the government’s current debt or future deficits.
The Case Against Deflation
Those who worry about deflation note that the U.S. consumer price index (CPI) has not increased at all in the past three months. Won’t that continue and feed on itself – as it has in Japan – as consumers delay spending in anticipation of even lower prices in the future? Also, doesn’t Japan’s persistent deflation since the early 1990s also show that, once it begins, deflation cannot be reversed by a policy of easy money or fiscal deficits?
A second reason for relatively low inflation in recent years has been a temporary fall in the cost of production. As firms shed workers during the economic downturn, output fell more slowly. The resulting rise in output per worker, together with slow wage growth, reduced unit labour costs. That process is now coming to an end as employment rises.
The good news is that: the possibility of significant inflation or deflation during the next few years is low on the list of economic risks faced by the U.S. economy and by financial investors.
[The bad news is that:] bond prices show that investors apparently expect inflation to remain low for 10 years and beyond, and that they also do not require higher interest rates as compensation for the risk that the fiscal deficit will cause real interest rates to rise in the future. [That’s just not realistic!]
* http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2010/6/26/business/6551926&sec=business (Martin Feldstein, a professor of economics at Harvard, was chairman of President Ronald Reagan’s Council of Economic Advisors and president of the National Bureau for Economic Research.)
– The above article consists of reformatted edited excerpts from the original for the sake of brevity, clarity and to ensure a fast and easy read. The author’s views and conclusions are unaltered.
– Permission to reprint in whole or in part is permitted provided full credit is given.
– Sign up to receive every article posted via Twitter, Facebook or RSS feed.
– Subscribe to our Weekly Newsletter.
– Submit a comment. Share your views on the subject with all our readers.