Harry Dent, the financial newsletter writer and CEO of economic forecasting firm HS Dent, has one of the most bearish calls on stocks we’ve heard in a while. Appearing on CNBC yesterday, Dent explained the demographics-driven thesis behind his Dow 3000 call.
So conveys Matthew Boesler (www.businessinsider.com) in his post entitled “HARRY DENT: The ‘Baby Bust’ Is Sending The Dow To 3,000“.
Lorimer Wilson, editor of www.munKNEE.com (Your Key to Making Money!) and www.FinancialArticleSummariesToday.com (A site for sore eyes and inquisitive minds) has edited the article below for length and clarity – see Editor’s Note at the bottom of the page. This paragraph must be included in any article re-posting to avoid copyright infringement.[The full interview between Seth Masters, who is forecasting Dow 20,000 (Read: Dow 20,000 – and 2,000 for the S&P 500 – Likely Within 5-10 Years! Here’s Why), and Harry Dent, who is forcasting Dow 3,000, can be seen here complete with a full transcript of the entire interview.
Boesler’s post provides the following excerpts from said interview, as follows:]
“We track demographics. We were more bullish than anybody in the 1990s and 2000s because we saw this giant generation spending more money, borrowing more money, technologies, internet rising. Now, it’s the opposite. From 2008 to 2020, the “Baby Bust” points trends down. There’s going to be less home buying, less spending. Baby boomers are going to be saving for retirement. There’s no way you can stimulate your way out of this.
I would agree with Seth – in normal times – [that] 20,000 is a reasonable target [for the Dow] but hey, just like we boomed unprecedented bubbles in the last few decades, when we see a correction after a major a debt and demographic bubble like this, you see the markets fall 70 to 80 percent.”
When asked when this fall to 3,000 on the Dow would happen, Dent replied:
“Over the next decade. We think the worst is likely to happen when this big debt bubble deleverages. The government has been preventing this by forcing money into the banking system. We don’t just have $16tn in government debt – we have $42tn in private debt that is deleveraging, and $66tn (or $80tn by different estimates) in unfunded entitlements.
We have the biggest debt bubble in history. This debt bubble needs to deleverage. That’s when stocks collapse the most. We had a big debt bubble deleverage from 1930 to 1933. That’s why we saw such an extreme crash.”
*http://www.businessinsider.com/harry-dent-baby-bust-dow-3000-2012-7#ixzz21ZKTlguG (To access the above article please copy the URL and paste it into your browser.)
Editor’s Note: The above posts may have been edited ([ ]), abridged (…), and reformatted (including the title, some sub-titles and bold/italics emphases) for the sake of clarity and brevity to ensure a fast and easy read. The article’s views and conclusions are unaltered and no personal comments have been included to maintain the integrity of the original article.
Most investors didn’t take warnings about the future of the economy and the financial marketplace – warnings that a ‘Category 6 Fiscal Storm’, a ‘Debt-Driven Meltdown’, a ‘Systemic Banking Crisis’, a ‘Financial Train Wreck’, a ‘God-Awful Fiscal Storm’, etc. was in store for the U.S. – seriously until it began. Perhaps this time around, before the other shoe drops, we should become more informed so we will be better positioned to survive and prosper regardless of what comes next. Words: 2128
Can experts, whether self-proclaimed or endorsed by others (publications), provide reliable stock market timing guidance? Do some experts clearly show better intuition about overall market direction than others? [NO is the answer to the first question and YES to the second. Let us explain how we came to those conclusions.] Words: 360
Last month, Wharton Professor Jeremy Siegel boldly claimed that there was a 70% chance that the DOW could reach 15,000 this year [and that] there’s a 50% chance that it could reach 17,500 by the end of 2013. [Here are his reasons]. Words: 291
To move up from the current 12,600 level to 20,000 by the summer of 2014, the Dow would need to rise about 16.5% each year or about 58% in a three-year period and in the past 25 years the Dow has risen by this much on at least 13 occasions. During those times, there was only one period of sustained annual gains, when the Dow rose an average of 26% from 1995 through 1999. The key question: what would it take to justify a three-year, steady, robust gain? It all comes down to corporate profits [and the extent to which] multiple investors are willing to assign [dollars] to these profits. [Let me explain.] Words: 761
Hot headlines about the Dow “storming back soon,” soaring to the “Next Stop, Dow 20,000” is nothing more than a new cycle of irrational exuberance. After losing an inflation-adjusted 20% the last decade, a prediction that the Dow will roar back 80% anytime soon is misleading, pure speculative hype. Reminds me of book titles like “Dow 36,000” and “Dow 100,000” back in 1999 – and memories of those mutual funds selling with absurd multiples over 40, with annual returns in excess of 100%. Worse than the tulip-bulb mania of the 1590s. What’s really roaring back is hype, happy talk and irrational exuberance. Words: 531
Most first quarter 2011 earnings reports are in and…over three-quarters exceeded expectations… [with] results showing a desirable combination of growing revenues, profitability and cash flow … [As such,] today’s stock market valuations are conservative compared to typical bull markets accompanied by investor enthusiasm. In the past, using 2011′s estimated earnings, the average P/E ratio could easily be 15 and…that would put the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) at 15,000 today – about 20% above today’s level. [Were we to] add in high optimism like the kind we’ve seen in other investments recently, a 20 P/E ratio would be possible – and the DJIA would be 20,000 – 60% higher [than it is today! Let’s take a look at the possibility.] Words: 540