A temporary period of deflation will result from the end of the Fed’s massive asset purchases followed by a period of inflation that will make the ’70s seem like an era of hard money. Here’s why.
The above introductory comments are paraphrased edited excerpts from an article* by Michael Pento (pentoport.com) as posted on SeekingAlpha.com under the title Why The Federal Reserve Will Never Be Able To Get Out Of QE.
Pento goes on to say in further edited excerpts:
In the middle of July the stock market finally awoke from its QE-induced coma and realized the Federal Reserve’s tapering, which has been going on for the last six months, was for real…[and this] ending of Fed asset purchases will be the pin that pops this QE-inflated market and economy.
…The Fed has increased its balance sheet by an unprecedented $3.5t since 2008…by purchasing Treasuries and MBS from banks in exchange for Fed credit. A credit from the Federal Reserve is a nuanced way of saying “new money”. This new money is transferred as a credit to the banks with the idea that the Fed can and will reverse this transaction at its discretion.
Like an army releases reserves, the Fed (with the help of private banks) has marched many of the new dollars into the economy to “save us” from deflation. Once the job is done, the Fed intends to call these dollars back and shrink its balance sheet back to pre-crisis levels. This all sounds great in theory, but as we will soon see, the practical applications of shrinking the Fed’s massive Balance Sheet has become impossible without creating a monetary depression…
Most people will be blindsided by the temporary period of deflation that will result from the end of the Fed’s massive asset purchases, as the monetary spigot for the primary beneficiary of the Fed’s credit – namely stocks and bonds – gets turned off.
Similar to the housing market in the mid-2000’s, we are about to relearn the lesson that many equity investors (especially those on margin) can only afford to hold on to an asset when prices are rising.
However, on the other end of this cyclical period of deflation, lies a period of inflation that will make the ’70s seem like an era of hard money. The reason for this is in order to fight inflation the Fed will have to bring home trillions of those “money troops” it sent into the economy. Calling the money back is going to be far more difficult than it was deploying it.
When the Fed buys Treasury debt, most of the interest payments made go back into the government’s coffers. In fact, by law the Treasury has claim to all income derived from the Federal Reserve, less expenses, so the Treasury pays the Federal Reserve an interest payment and in return receives most of that payment back. This is a pretty good deal for the Treasury considering the Fed’s profit is in the neighborhood of $91 billion a year. This means the Treasury not only didn’t have to find a real buyer for the newly issued debt but it also did not have to worry about paying interest on that debt.
It gets even better! As the bonds mature, the Fed has been rolling over the principal. Therefore, it is as if the $2.4 trillion of newly issued Treasury bonds sold to the Fed since 2008 don’t even exist. The Treasury gets reimbursed on its interest payments and never even had to worry about what the cost would be for the private market to purchase that debt. To further sweeten the pot, the Fed has pushed rates down to unprecedented lows, leading to relatively-modest debt service payments on all of its record-breaking $17.6 trillion of outstanding debt.
If the Fed wants to genuinely fight inflation, however, it will have to eventually raise interest rates. Ending QE will only provide temporary relief from a weakening currency. To accomplish this in sustainable fashion it will have to shrink its balance sheet back to around the same level it was prior to the Great Recession.
How does the Fed shrink its balance sheet? As we discussed, when the Fed purchases a bond from a bank it creates a credit that can be taken back at the Fed’s discretion. Taking the credits back on a short-term basis is called a reverse repo.
The Fed sells the assets back to the banking system and takes back the cash for a very limited period of time – but it just cannot conduct reverse repos to the tune of trillions of dollars without putting extreme pressure on the market for private short-term loans. This means the government is not only going to have to permanently sell the over $2 trillion in bonds into the market, it will have to start paying real interest on that debt as well and, in addition, the private market will also have to finance all the new annual deficits, which will no longer have the luxury of a trillion dollar plus annual QE program from our central bank.
The net effect of all this would be surging interest rates and a complete economic collapse. This is why I do not expect the Fed’s balance sheet to significantly contract for many years, if at all, and predict inflation will become a huge and growing problem–especially after the central bank launches another massive QE program in 2015 to re-inflate falling stock prices.
Editor’s Note: The author’s views and conclusions in the above article are unaltered and no personal comments have been included to maintain the integrity of the original post. Furthermore, the views, conclusions and any recommendations offered in this article are not to be construed as an endorsement of such by the editor.
*http://seekingalpha.com/article/2423075-why-the-federal-reserve-will-never-be-able-to-get-out-of-qe?ifp=0 ( © 2014 Seeking Alpha )
If you liked this article then “Follow the munKNEE” & get each new post via
With all of the things in the world to worry about, how much should we worry about a sudden sharp increase in UST yields? The short answer is not much and here is why. Read More »
After a long period of very low interest rates following the global financial crisis the central banks of the U.S. and U.K. are planning to gradually tighten their easy monetary policies as their economies improve. When their benchmark interest rates go up, interest rates elsewhere will go up to so should we worry if and when global financial conditions tighten? Read More »
We’re doomed! Even if the economy were growing at a faster pace, it wouldn’t come close to offsetting the interest payments on our ever-expanding debt. As such, any sort of credit shock – either rising rates or a decline in the rate of debt expansion – will cause the system to implode. Let me explain why that is the case. Read More »
Everyone knows that interest rates are going to rise in the future so the real question is not whether they will rise, but when and by how much. [This article analyzes when that will most likely be.] Read More »
4 economic conditions need to be in place for interest rates to rise ahead of – and independent of – the Fed’s forward guidance. The economy met only one of those conditions to date but will likely meet all four by the end of the year…What follows is a status report on the four conditions. Read More »
Everyone and their mom is expecting long-term interest rates to rise now that the Fed is tapering its bond buying programs. I have a couple of problems with this line of thinking because, although it seems like reducing demand for a security (i.e. tapering QE) would result in a drop in price, when you really think about how quantitative easing works this makes no sense and, secondly, the market is telling us this makes no sense. Let me explain. Read More »
The belief is that rising interest rates (as is currently occurring) are a sign that the economy is improving as activity is pushing borrowing rates higher. In turn, as investors, this bodes well for corporate profitability which supports the current valuations of stocks in the market. While this seems completely logical the question is whether, or not, this is really the case? Read More »
There is one vitally important number that everyone needs to be watching right now, and it doesn’t have anything to do with unemployment, inflation or housing. If this number gets too high, it will collapse the entire U.S. financial system. The number that I am talking about is the yield on 10 year U.S. Treasuries. Here’s why. Words: 1161; Charts: 2 Read More »
History clearly shows that stocks don’t fall during periods of rising interest rates. Sure, they might fall a little when a rate hike is announced – maybe for a week or so – but they usually bounce back quickly – and then they go higher. Read More »
It seems that the past few years of falling interest rates have lulled a big part of the global economy into financing with variable-rate debt…[As such,] when interest rates go up (as they did last week), there’s a world-wide reset in interest costs that, best case, amounts to a tax increase on individuals and businesses and, worst-case, threatens to blow up the whole system. Read More »
The global financial system is potentially heading for massive amounts of trouble if interest rates continue to soar. So what does all this mean exactly? [Let me explain.] Read More »
If yields on U.S. Treasury bonds keep rising, things are going to get very messy. What we are ultimately looking at is a sell-off very similar to 2008, only this time we will have to deal with rising interest rates at the same time. The conditions for a “perfect storm” are rapidly developing, and if something is not done we could eventually have a credit crunch.
Don’t get too worked up over interest on the national debt or what will happen when interest rates rise because, by then, we’ll likely be talking about ways to cool down the economy. [Why?] Because interest rates on US government debt are really a function of economic growth. If the economy is weak the Fed will pin short rates to stimulate the economy and if rates rise it’s going to be a function of better days ahead. Words: 525 Read More »Read More »
Might our Inflation-Deflation Watch be suggesting a breakout in asset price inflation is about to take place? Could it, in fact, be presaging the start of John William’s hyper inflationary depression in which prices rise exponentially even in light of massive unemployment and bankruptcies? This article analyzes the situation. Read More »
At the end of last year virtually every every single economist expected interest rates to rise this year as the Fed tapered their purchases and the economy improved but, in fact, interest rates on the 10 year U.S. Treasury have been going down year to date (from 3% to 2.5% after rising from about 1.6% to 3% last year). The masses, going along with this crowd, got fooled but we have been calling for a decline in interest rates for some time now due to world-wide deflation and it couldn’t be clearer to us that this is the most likely scenario for the United States. Let us explain. Read More »
Don’t listen to what the official numbers say. Inflation is a big problem already for the U.S. economy – and in an inflationary environment, gold bullion goes up and stock prices go down, because materials cost more and consumers spend less. I’d adjust my portfolio accordingly for the rapid inflation that awaits us. Read More »
TIPS are telling us that the market is quite pessimistic about the prospects for real growth, but not concerned at all about the outlook for inflation. Read More »
Many investors are treating inflation as a certainty because the Fed has expanded its balance sheet to unheard of levels through its quantitative easing strategy. Some have even gone so far as to say that this program will utterly destroy the U.S. currency. To demystify this conclusion, I’m going to explain quantitative easing and why the Fed is using this monetary strategy. Afterward, I’ll explain why gold is still positioned to rise even if inflation continues to be low. Words: 786
If inflation starts to head towards 5%, you can be sure it’s headed for 10% because they don’t have the ability to stop it now. The only antidote they have to the mess we are in, which is massively excessive debt reinforced by derivatives, is unlimited money printing. The idea that you can withdraw the punch bowl or sharply raise interest rates, it just doesn’t exist, unless you want to take a complete deflationary collapse.
James Turk believes hyperinflation is ahead. Bob Prechter believes massive deflation is coming. An interesting discussion between the two takes place in this audio. Ultimately, both lead to Depression. Only the route taken differs, but that is important.
Whether our current economic crisis will end with massive inflation or in a deflationary spiral (ultimately, either one results in a Depression) is more than an academic one. It is the single most important variable for near and intermediate term investing success. It is also important in regard to taking actions which can prepare and protect you and your family. [Here is my assessment of what the future outcome will likely be and why.] Words: 1441
The developed economies of the world have opened the money spigots…[and this] massive money and credit creation is sitting in the banking system like dry tinder just waiting for a spark to set it ablaze. How quickly it happens is anyone’s guess, but once it does we are likely to be enveloped in a worldwide inflation unlike anything before ever witnessed. [Let me explain further.] Words: 625
People get confused about the nature of mass inflation, hyperinflation, and what causes both. [Let me clarify the nature and causes of each.] Words: 930
On the surface, policy settings around the world look very inflationary with large fiscal deficits and aggressively easy monetary policies yet it is hard to see inflation gaining any traction [with] global activity so weak and the monetary transmission process so impaired in many countries. There is more of a deflationary than inflationary tone to the economic environment and it does not look as if this will change any time soon.