Bank of Canada Governor John Carney and US Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke are proudly predicting that GDP will turn positive in 2010, but much of that growth will be the result of trillions of dollars of government spending. There is only one politically acceptable way to pay for those trillions, and that is to expand the money supply at an explosive rate. That is exactly what the US Federal Reserve has been doing for the past year. History and economics tell us, unfortunately, that rapid increases in the money supply spell big trouble for investors because they set the stage for spiralling inflation. Words: 2808

In further edited excerpts from the original article* Nick Barisheff (www.bmginc.ca) goes on to say:

Below are four big reasons to worry about inflation:

1: TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS ARE BEING PRINTED OUT OF THIN AIR
The global response to this crisis has been chaotic and ad hoc. The key policy plank seems to be to throw money at the problem until it goes away. Because it is determined to ward off a deflationary spiral at any cost, the Federal Reserve is pumping trillions of dollars into the US and global economies by purchasing massive amounts of treasury bonds and mortgage-backed securities. In order to do so, the Fed has had to balloon its balance sheet to over $3 trillion in assets (from a normal level of under $1 trillion). Much of this has come from printing money out of thin air.

The inflationary implications of this action are obvious, but what is not so obvious is why they need to do it. The US economy has not been healthy for many years. A series of Fed-induced asset bubbles have masked a sobering reality: the lack of real economic growth. The toxicity in the system as a result of years of fiscal and monetary irresponsibility has not been washed away by this crisis, and if anything it has increased. The US economy’s structural imbalances remain, and misplaced monetary policy is allowing them to fester and multiply.

So why hasn’t inflation already happened? Because in order to shore up their cash reserves, the banks are hoarding most of the money being sent their way by the US Federal Reserve. Hoarding reduces the “velocity” of the money in circulation, and this lower velocity has offset increased supply. But this is a temporary phenomenon. Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke is committed to pouring as much money into the system as it takes because, as he famously stated, “under a paper-money system, a determined government can always generate higher spending and hence positive inflation.”

Once the banks start lending the money that they’re now keeping as reserves, money velocity will reverse course and accelerate rapidly, prompting economists such as Lawrence Kotlikoff to warn that US money supply will likely triple in size by the end of this year. It will be very hard for the Fed to put the lid on inflation if that happens.

Virtually every government in the world has taken the easy way out. In a recent issue of Atlantic Monthly, former IMF economist Simon Johnson expressed concern that the bankers and financiers who played the central role in creating the crisis are now using their influence “to prevent precisely the sorts of reforms that are needed.” What’s worse, the government seems helpless, or unwilling, to act against them.

2: GOVERNMENT DEBT IS AT RECORD LEVELS
Let’s examine for a moment the sorry state of US indebtedness. Due to ongoing bailouts and stimulus packages, the US will experience a record $1.75 trillion deficit in 2009. US debt (accumulated deficits), as tracked by the famous US National Debt Clock in Manhattan, stands at a staggering $11.8 trillion and counting. In 2008 alone, the government paid a staggering $451 billion in interest, according to the government’s own website, TreasuryDirect.gov. And that number is expected to rise substantially in 2009.

That figure – $11.8 trillion – is a mindboggling amount of money but it represents only a part of America’s total liabilities. If Social Security and Medicare obligations are included (which they should be), obligations rise to over $106 trillion dollars, according to the US Treasury. None of this money has been set aside, but has instead been borrowed by the government for its own use. When combined with the debt of nearly $11.8 trillion, total debt soars to an astonishing $118.6 trillion, or nearly ten times total GDP, or $300,000 per person.

Former US Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson warned about this problem just last year, noting that it “will drive government spending to unprecedented levels, consume nearly all projected federal revenues and threaten America’s future prosperity.”

Financial analyst Jim Puplava says that while the US government is funding Medicare with Medicare Trust bills tthere is nothing actually backing those bonds. Since the government will shy away from raising taxes, the answer will be to print yet more money out of thin air.

America’s massive debt and unfunded liabilities make inflation the only viable option for today’s policymakers because when the value of future dollars is diminished, future obligations in those depreciated dollars are diminished.

Investors are not just facing a future of uncomfortably high inflation; they may be facing hyperinflation if the US dollar loses its reserve currency status. Raising taxes to pay for the bailouts is political suicide, but printing money is not.

Monetary authorities have done a good job of keeping investors in the dark, and they have had help from a surprising source: the media. The overprinting of money is never discussed by the US financial mainstream press and therefore goes undetected by the majority of people. Money printing may be the ultimate stealth monetary policy tool, but it has lethal consequences.

Even famed stock investor Warren Buffett has become concerned about inflation. In March of this year, Buffett expressed concern that stimulus efforts may lead to an inflation exceeding that of the 1970s. These are not idle remarks; they emanate from one of Obama’s own (unofficial) economic advisors. Buffett knows that when massive money printing is combined with bloated government debt, it makes it exceedingly difficult for any central bank to raise interest rates. And yet, as the early 1980s so painfully taught us, that is the only policy measure that can contain inflation.

The US government and Federal Reserve are caught in a fiscal and monetary bind of their own creation. 1) Zero percent interest rates are having minimal impact on growth, yet 2) with the exception of one or two quarters, prices of goods and services are still rising. 3) Rates must rise to contain inflation when it heats up, but 4) massive and growing US debt will make it nearly impossible for policymakers to raise rates.

3: THE CPI INFLATION INDEX DOES NOT REFLECT TRUE INFLATION
In both Canada and the US, inflation is hurting our pocketbooks, but you wouldn’t know it from the Consumer Price Index (CPI). That’s because the CPI is understated by as much as 7 percent per year according to economist John Williams, who has been tracking US CPI for many years. In addition, North American investors and consumers seldom hear the “headline” inflation number. Instead, the financial media usually report only the “core” inflation number, which excludes food and energy. This was done, ostensibly, to remove volatility from the CPI but food and energy account for about 23 percent of consumer spending, so how can they be ignored? Governments have a major incentive to understate CPI because trillions of dollars’ worth of pension funds, health benefits and wage increases for public sector employees are indexed to it.

Today’s CPI is substantially understated because it is calculated using a complex re-weighting formula that is riddled with substitutions, exclusions, hedonic adjustments and geometric weighting. If we were to recreate the CPI using the original 1983 formula, we would discover that even though we have experienced asset depreciation following the credit crisis, price inflation for goods and services has not gone away. And if the monetary authorities had decided to factor home prices into the CPI, the bubble would have been far more obvious from the beginning.

CPI distortion is consistent with most investors’ first-hand experience of prices of goods and services at the ‘street view’ level. What parent has not experienced tuition shock when their children enter college? Who isn’t paying more for basics like milk, even this year?

Intelligent investment decisions can’t be made without knowing the true rate of inflation. In a world where savings rates currently average 1 percent, an inflation rate of just 2 percent is a guaranteed loss. There is nothing that governments are better at than debasing their own currency. The Canadian and US dollar have lost more than 80 percent of their value since 1970. Again, this is reflective of a concerted monetary policy that continuously drives excessive growth in the money supply. When a country’s money supply is increased faster than its rate of economic growth, the purchasing power of that country’s currency declines and prices rise.

4: OIL PRODUCTION HAS ALREADY PEAKED
The world’s central banks are printing money and running deficits. As for America, the world’s largest economy is massively in debt, its unfunded liabilities are approaching $106 trillion, its spending is out of control, there is explosive growth in its money supply, and its official CPI is blatantly distorted. All this would be more than enough to spark dramatic inflation, but there is also another inflationary factor we must deal with: Peak Oil.

Peak Oil is not someone’s pet theory. It is not a rumour spread by left-leaning conservationists. Peak Oil is supported by hard production data. Peak Oil is a field-by-field extrapolation of what has already happened to existing oil fields. As most investors know, the US has had to import ever-increasing amounts of oil as their own supplies have decreased but now the exact same thing is happening in Britain’s North Sea and in Mexico.

Oil is a finite resource, and many of the world’s largest oil fields are being rapidly depleted. The maximum rate of global petroleum extraction has peaked, and now the rate of production is entering terminal decline. The reason for the decline is, to a large extent, the lack of new discoveries. Most of the major discoveries were made in the 1950s and 1960s. Since then, the annual discoveries of oil have kept dropping to the point where, when we take oil out, we do not replace the reserves.

While it is true that as more wells are drilled and newer and better technology is installed, production initially increases, eventually a peak output is reached and oil production not only begins to decline but also becomes less cost effective. At some point in this decline, the energy it takes to extract, transport and refine a barrel of oil exceeds the energy contained in that barrel of oil. This is happening now. Simply put, the world is quickly running out of cheap oil.

Years ago, Nobel-Prize winning economist Milton Friedman explained that global inflation was a monetary phenomenon that was subject to external shocks and to unpredictable time lags. Soaring oil prices are an external shock just waiting to happen to the monetary system. Because oil is such a vital component of so many products and services we consume, higher oil prices mean higher prices for nearly everything, not just now but over the long term.

Oil is unique, more like a currency than a commodity. The price of oil directly affects the price of the Canadian and Australian dollars. It is the lifeblood of business productivity and essential to our everyday life. It is the reason America’s foreign policy designates certain areas of the world as strategic, but not others. Although Canada is a net exporter of oil, it is not energy independent. Canada imports significant quantities of energy from the US and Europe. At the same time, the Canadian and US markets for petroleum products are deeply integrated, so supply problems in the US affect not only American consumers but Canadian consumers as well.
High oil prices were forgotten when oil prices declined from $147 per barrel to a low of $30 per barrel. However, prices have rapidly risen back up to $70+ per barrel, and are poised to rise much higher. US oil production peaked in 1986, Alaskan production in 1990 and North Sea production in 2000. Global oil production is believed to have peaked in 2008.

The US is the world’s biggest oil importer, but global demand is growing rapidly, particularly in India and China. Between 2003 and 2007 China’s oil demand grew at nine times the US rate. Meanwhile, in India, less than 1 percent now own cars but sales are growing at a rate of 20 percent per year. At the same time, many countries that were exporters are retaining a greater and greater percentage of their oil for their own burgeoning consumption needs, so they have far less to export.

The International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates that three more Saudi Arabias will have to be found and brought on stream just to meet the needs of China and India.

The clearest example of collapsing oil production is Mexico’s Cantarell field, the largest oil field in the Western World. From over two million barrels per day in 2004-2005, Cantarell now produces only 700,000 barrels per day. Soon Mexico will itself become an oil importer – no longer the third-largest exporter to the US.

It is projected that in the next few years Mexico will become a net importer rather than an exporter of oil. As a result, the US will lose its third-largest supplier.

Jeff Rubin, for more than 20 years the chief economist at CIBC World Markets, makes a compelling case for oil to soon rise to $225. “It’s not that the world is running out of oil in an absolute geological sense,” he says, “but it is running out of the type of oil you and I can afford to fill your tank with.” In his recently published book, Why Your World Is About to Get a Whole Lot Smaller, he writes that a world that was built on cheap oil is about to go through a radical transformation because of high oil prices. The debate is no longer about whether costs will rise. The debate is about how society will react and cope, because the economic, social and political costs of Peak Oil will be unprecedented.

The Fed Can’t Simply Shut Off the Money Spigot at Will
Pouring money into everything that moves may end one crisis but it will surely jumpstart another far more damaging one for investors. Despite Ben Bernanke’s protestations, the money supply spigot cannot simply be turned off when inflation starts to heat up because there is a 12- to 18-month time lag between monetary policy implementation and its effect.

Investors who believe we are living in a deflationary period should ask themselves a simple question: why are grocery prices and gas prices and hairdressing prices and insurance costs continuing to rise? What investors fail to understand is that price deflation is very different from asset depreciation. Asset depreciation (stock and real estate prices falling) has a negative wealth effect, but no effect on purchasing power. Price deflation, on the other hand, has a positive purchasing power effect. None of us can say our purchasing power is increasing, despite the recent negative CPI numbers. Price deflation is nowhere to be seen at this point. Since 1971, when the world went to a pure fiat monetary system controlled by central banks, currency in all countries has lost purchasing power. In Canada and the US it is down over 80 percent.

Today’s massive and still rising unemployment will do little to dampen the inflation fires, because inflation is never caused by too much demand but rather by too much money in the system. To paraphrase the late, great economist Milton Friedman, inflation is always and everywhere a loose monetary policy phenomenon. As the stagflation era of the 1970s clearly demonstrated, if slow growth could tame inflation, we would not have suffered through years of high inflation and low growth.

Inflation hurts stock prices because inflation increases volatility and uncertainty and risk, which makes businesses more risk averse, which reduces profits, which reduces price/earnings multiples. And lower P/Es always lead to lower stock prices.

It is difficult to determine exactly where we are in the recovery process. That’s why the money spigot can’t be easily shut off. Too little money and a nascent recovery could be choked off. Too much money and inflation will be impossible to control.

If virtually all of the world’s brightest financial minds missed the telltale warning signs of a bursting credit bubble in 2008, why should we believe they have any more insight into a recovery now?

For investors, it is not a question of if but when inflation will arrive.

*http://www.financialsense.com/fsu/editorials/bms/2009/1125.html (Nick Barisheff is President and CEO of Bullion Management Group Inc., a bullion investment company that provides investors with a cost-effective, convenient way to purchase and store physical bullion. Visit www.bmginc.ca for details.)

Editor’s Note:
- The above article consists of reformatted edited excerpts from the original for the sake of brevity, clarity and to ensure a fast and easy read. The author’s views and conclusions are unaltered.
- Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
- Sign up to receive every article posted via Twitter, Facebook, RSS feed or our Weekly Newsletter.
- Submit a comment. Share your views on the subject with all our readers.
- Buy the book below from Amazon. It’s pertinent to this article and inexpensive too.

In spite of philosophical differences in many areas of politics and economics, Ron Paul and Simon Johnson agree that the cosiness that exists between the U. S. Congress and the financial elite has not worked, and is not working, in the best interest of the average American. They both suggest that major changes must be made in that relationship to strengthen the American economy. Is it too late, however, to avoid the repercussions of an even weaker greenback, rising inflation and the opening of the floodgates in the price of all investments related to gold and silver? www.MunKnee.com; By: Lorimer Wilson; Words: 1336

“When Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner was Chairman of the New York Federal Reserve, he urged AIG officials not to disclose to the Securities Exchange Commission relevant details of agreements with banks to bail out Goldman Sachs. Apparently he felt at the time that regulators and the public would be angry that taxpayer money was used to fully compensate bankers who made some horrifically bad investment decisions. These banks should have suffered the consequences of the huge risks they were taking. After all, they kept plenty of rewards when times were good. Instead, the Fed found a way to socialize these major losses so these banks could survive and continue making more bad decisions, at the expense of the American people and the value of the dollar.” So says Dr. Ron Paul in an article* entitled ‘Why the Fed Likes Independence’.

Paul’s comments are a perfect follow-up to earlier comments by Simon Johnson who, in his article** entitled “The Quiet Coup”, says that the finance industry has effectively captured our government going on to say:

Financial Oligarchy Remains Unchallenged
“America is in financial crisis but instead of the financial oligarchy being broken up to permit essential reform they are continuing to use their influence to prevent precisely the sorts of reforms that are needed. Unfortunately, our legislators seem unwilling to act against these powerful financiers opting instead to succumb to their power and influence and continue to give them what they deem to be in their best interest instead of that of the taxpayers’.

All this is happening because of the false belief, by all concerned, that large financial institutions and free-flowing capital markets are crucial to America’s position in the world and that whatever the banks say is true, and what they want is necessary. The government’s velvet-glove approach with the banks is deeply troubling, for one simple reason: it is inadequate to change the behavior of a financial sector accustomed to doing business on its own terms, at a time when that behavior must change. There is no better time to take such action than now but it is evident that reform is but a pipe dream. America’s financial oligarchy is still in control and, as such, the long-term consequences will be dire!”

Powerful Elite Protecting Their Own
Paul reports that “Geithner claims he had to take such politically unpopular actions to save the economy from collapse. Half of that is right – it was politically unpopular, but it is extremely premature at best, to claim the economy has been saved…It is hard to argue that this sort of government waste has done anything but harm to our economy. Raiding Main Street to bail out Wall Street is a foolish idea.”

Johnson goes further saying that “typically countries in crisis are in a desperate economic situation for one simple reason—the powerful elites within them overreached in good times and took too many risks. That certainly is the case with the powerful elites – the financial oligarchy – in America…they (the American financial industry) gained political power over the years by amassing a kind of cultural capital, a belief system in which Washington insiders believe that large financial institutions and free-flowing capital markets are crucial to America’s position in the world … and always and utterly convinced that whatever the banks said was true.”

Lack of Transparency Troubling
Paul makes the point that Geithner’s revelation shows the need for Fed transparency and that “their claim that they should have “independence” is a canard. They very much enjoy their comfortable pattern of bailing out friends and devaluing the currency with no oversight and no accountability. Geithner specifically asked officials at AIG not to disclose to the SEC or to the public particulars about this special deal for his friends. We only know these details now because AIG was eventually forthcoming when Congress demanded some answers.”

Paul’s views only confirm Johnson’s who put forth that “When the crisis first began the government was slow to react and then did so with a lack of transparency, and an unwillingness to upset the financial sector. The response so far is perhaps best described as “policy by deal” in that when a major financial institution got into trouble, the Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve engineered a one-of bailout and then announced that everything is fine without stating what combination of interests were being served, and how. This was late-night, backroom dealing, pure and simple.”

Congress Should be More Responsible
Paul concludes that “We should be getting information on all such dealings straight from the Fed. The Fed should be accountable to Congress because it is a creature of Congress. The Constitution gives Congress the authority to oversee the integrity of the monetary unit. We have unwisely and unconstitutionally delegated this authority to the Federal Reserve, which has in turn devalued our dollar by 95 percent and counting. When the Federal Reserve engages in harmful policies, Congress is still ultimately responsible. If the Fed is not made accountable through a GAO audit at least, it will continue to be accountable to no one, and that is unacceptable.”

Unfortunately, as Johnson sees it, “Regulators, legislators, and academics almost all assumed that the managers of these banks knew what they were doing. In retrospect, they didn’t. As more and more of the rich made their money in finance, the cult of finance seeped into the culture at large. In a society that celebrates the idea of making money, it was easy to infer that the interests of the financial sector were the same as the interests of the country and that the winners in the financial sector knew better what was good for America than did the career civil servants in Washington. Faith in free financial markets grew into conventional wisdom—trumpeted on the editorial pages of The Wall Street Journal and on the floor of Congress.

Throughout the crisis, the government has taken extreme care not to upset the interests of the financial institutions, or to question the basic outlines of the system that got us here. This velvet-glove approach is inadequate to change the behavior of a financial sector accustomed to doing business on its own terms, at a time when that behavior must change.”

What Will Financial Elite’s Behavior Mean for Your Investments?
The major bailouts to the banks and the following major stimulus spending will further destroy the strength of the U. S. dollar and cause significant inflation. That in turn will be favorable for the future price of gold and silver, more favorable for those companies that mine such precious metals, even more so for the few gold and silver royalty companies that exist and, in particular, those that have warrants.

We may not like what has, and still is, happening with the behavior of our politicians and the country’s financial oligarchy but we can, and should, prepare now for the financial rewards their actions (and inaction) will bring our way. Just prepare for the inevitable, be patient as it unfolds and then enjoy your new found prosperity.

*http://www.house.gov/htbin/blog_inc?BLOG,tx14_paul,blog,999,All,Item%20not%20found,ID=100111_3628,TEMPLATE=postingdetail.shtml
**http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2009/05/the-quiet-coup/7364/

Editor’s Note:
- Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
- Sign up to receive every article posted via Twitter, Facebook, RSS feed or our Weekly Newsletter.
- Submit a comment. Share your views on the subject with all our readers.
- Buy the book below from Amazon. It’s pertinent to this article and inexpensive too.