The Global Competitiveness Report 2015-2016 assesses the competitiveness of 140 world economies. Using a mixture of quantitative and survey data, it ranks countries overall by combining 113 indicators grouped under 12 pillars of competitiveness: institutions; infrastructure; macroeconomic environment; health and primary education; higher education and training; goods market efficiency; labour market efficiency; financial market development; technological readiness; market size; business sophistication; and innovation.
1. Switzerland tops the Global Competitiveness Index for the seventh year in a row.
It leads the world in it’s capacity to innovate and scores highly for it’s education system and labour market efficiency. Switzerland’s infrastructure is strong, it’s public institutions are effective and transparent, and it’s macroeconomic environment is more stable than most.
Still, the cost of doing business in Switzerland is high – and it’s strong currency, negative real interest rates and uncertainty about future immigration policy are all cautions against complacency.
2. Singapore beats everyone but Switzerland for the fifth consecutive year.
Its competitiveness is broad-based – it scores in the top 10 in nine out of the 12 pillars. Its particular strengths are the efficiency of its goods, labour and financial markets and the quality of its higher education and training system. It also scores strongly for its infrastructure, macroeconomic stability and the transparency and efficiency of institutions.
Areas for improvement include a relatively low rate of participation of women in the workforce.
3. The United States holds steady in third place.
The foundations for its competitiveness include human capital, sophisticated businesses and capacity for innovation, with high levels of spending on research and development and good collaboration between the private sector and academia. It has improved in the last year on measures of government efficiency and the soundness of its financial markets – but the expected phase-out of accommodative monetary policy will test improvements in macroeconomic stability.
The U.S. must also avoid complacency on education – the country ranks 18th – for quality of education and improvements are required for the nation to remain a talent-driven economy.
4. Germany is the first mover in this year’s index, climbing one place to fourth thanks in part to improvements in its macroeconomic environment.
It has also advanced on the efficiency of financial markets and the labour market – although it’s low score on labour market flexibility indicates that there is still considerable scope to bolster competitiveness here through further reforms.
Germany’s competitive strengths include its highly sophisticated businesses, excellent on-the-job training, rapid uptake of new technologies and supportive research environment.
5. The Netherlands climbs three places to fifth, regaining its highest-ever position in the index on the back of small improvements across a wide range of indicators.
Its strongest scores come in areas including education, infrastructure, institutions, business sophistication and innovation.
It’s weaknesses include inflexibilities in the labour market and continuing doubts about its financial markets. Its score on financial market development is still significantly lower than in 2007, before the global financial crisis and the bursting of the Netherlands’ real estate bubble.
6. Japan remains in sixth place.
Its competitiveness is founded on excellent infrastructure, a healthy workforce and a strong ecosystem for innovation thanks to sophisticated businesses, early adoption of new technologies and high-quality research institutions. Its macroeconomic environment scores more highly than a year ago, due in part to the return of moderate inflation.
Japan’s continuing areas of relative weakness include human capital, with a low rate of female participation in the labour force showing that the country is failing to use its talent efficiently.
7. Hong Kong SAR places seventh for the third consecutive year, with a performance almost unchanged from last year and showing a good degree of consistency across the 12 pillars.
Its particular strengths include its well-developed financial sector, transport infrastructure and dynamic goods and labour markets.
Innovation is among the pillars of competitiveness on which it performs relatively less well, with business leaders citing Hong Kong’s capacity to innovate as their biggest concern.
8. Finland drops to eighth from fourth last year, having been third for the two previous years.
With unemployment at 9.5%, GDP still 6% lower in 2014 than in 2008, and growing public deficit and debt, Finland’s macroeconomic situation gives some cause for concern.
However, it still beats many other advanced economies and the country retains some strong fundamentals: its public institutions are rated as the most transparent and efficient in the world; its higher education and training system is excellent; and it has a strong capacity for innovation.
9. Sweden overtakes the United Kingdom to claim ninth place.
It’s competitiveness based on its efficient and transparent institutions, excellent education system, sophisticated businesses and an innovation ecosystem that benefits from high levels of technological adoption.
Among the country’s remaining weak spots are overly restrictive labour regulations and tax rate on profits that, while it has decreased in recent years, remains high by international standards.
10. The United Kingdom slips one place to 10th, despite improving it’s performance in many areas.
It’s strengths include solid institutions and some of the best universities in the world.
The country’s weak spots include it’s macroeconomic environment, with high government deficits meaning the public debt has doubled since 2007. The UK’s financial market is still recovering from the crisis, but remains one of the best developed in the world.
The Global Competitiveness Report 2015-2016 is available here.
Related Articles from the munKNEE Vault:
An in-depth report on global innovation has been co-released by Cornell University, INSEAD, and the World Intellectual Property Organization covering a total of 141 countries that make up 98.6% of global GDP. The report uses innovation inputs and outputs to create an overall Global Innovation Index with a score for each country. Rather than comparing all countries together, we decided to look at Canada and the United States to see which of the 49th parallel neighbours is the most innovative country. Here it is!
19 of the 23 poorest countries in the world are located in Africa. The DRC (Democratic Republic of Congo) is the poorest with its citizens earning on average $394.25 a year (compared with Qatar where people earn an average of $105,091.42 a year). Afghanistan is the first non-African country (10th place) and also the first country where the average annual income passes the $1,000 threshold ($1072.19). Here’s the complete list.
Qatar, Luxembourg and Singapore are the three richest countries in the world. HERE’s a list of the top 23 such countries.
The infographic below shows the difference in living costs around the world using CPI data as a relative indicator of a country’s living costs compared to New York (for example, if a country has a CPI of 70, on average, it enjoys 30% cheaper living costs compared to New York).
Why does Canada rank higher than the United States, a country often referred to as the ‘Land of Liberty’? Guess which countries ranked in the top 5? Where does your country rank?
The Legatum Prosperity Index survey, as shown in the following table, ranks countries on eight different attributes, and then consolidates those attributes into an ‘overall ranking’. The report says that the U.S. has fallen out of the top 10 (to #12) in the ‘most prosperous country ranking’ increasing doubts about the health of its economy and ability of its politicians. Read the balance of the article to see where your country is ranked overall and in each of the 8 different categories. Words: 520
According to the 2nd annual World Happiness Report of the Earth Institute, sponsored by the UN, Canada slipped to 6th place among the world’s happiest countries, Australia ranked 10th and the U.S. dropped down to below that of its neighbours to the south including Costa Rica, Panama and Mexico. Where does your country rank? Read on!
Change in wages, productivity, energy costs & currency values are dramatically redrawing the map of global manufacturing cost competitiveness. The new map will surprise you.
In absolute size of net foreign liabilities the U.S. leads the way but, as a share of GDP, its position is much less than that of Spain & Poland who exceed the acceptable level of 60%. Where does your country rank?
This infographic shows the difference in Monthly Personal Disposable Income around the world using data from 2014. In this context personal disposable income refers to the income per person after all taxes have been paid.