Wednesday , 18 October 2017

Why We Will Never See a Return to a Gold Standard – Ever!

We’re not going back to a gold standard – anywhere – any time soon!

There are three simple reasons … you need your own private gold standard, rather than waiting on “sound money” from government. Words: 1323

So says Adrian Ash ( in an article* which Lorimer Wilson, editor of, has reformatted into edited […] excerpts below for the sake of clarity and brevity to ensure a fast and easy read. (Please note that this paragraph must be included in any article reposting to avoid copyright infringement.) Ash goes on to say:

1. Gold Pricing & Value Insufficient

Gold prices [just] aren’t high enough. Backing the world’s broad-money supply with gold – even at the 40% cover-ratio set by the United States in the interwar years – would require a gold price near… $4,000 per ounce – and that’s with all the gold ever mined in history locked inside central-bank vaults, by the way. Full cover for a reserves-backed gold standard would need prices above $10,000 per ounce.

Editor’s Note: Don’t forget to sign up for our FREE weekly “Top 100 Stock Market, Asset Ratio & Economic Indicators in Review”

[In addition,] gold is not priced highly enough against financial assets to warrant becoming the world’s sole monetary arbiter. Now valued at $7.6 trillion, the near-170,000 tonnes of gold ever mined in history is worth only 3.9% of total investable wealth. That figure compares with well over 20% pre-1930 – a valuation which at current mining-production rates (and with constant asset prices) would require a gold price of $6,650 per ounce by 2015, or $6,230 per ounce by 2020 [based on] BullionVault‘s math.

So, although recovering from what was, a decade ago, the weakest role gold ever played in the world’s financial system, it remains dwarfed by other, more widely-held and heavily-weighted assets – most obviously the US Dollar and Treasury bonds.

2. Official-Sector Holdings of Gold Insufficient

Modern governments don’t hold enough gold – not for their tastes, at least. [After all,] as a proportion of the above-ground total world governments haven’t held this little gold since 1911… [which] marked [the] high tide for the classical gold-coin standard.

With the ebb [in gold holdings, however,] came the Federal Reserve, the welfare state, and “mixed-economy” planning… [and] demolishing these pillars of “soft money” in the next five or 10 years, let alone unwinding the centralized urge to control price-levels, GDP growth and the free transfer of capital, looks less likely than even another quadrupling of gold prices.

[In addition,] the largest gold holders do not show any enthusiasm for mobilizing their gold hoards as part, never mind the base of their monetary systems. The No.1 official holder, the United States, last flirted with talk of a return to gold in the early ’80s but back then, gold’s private-investment weighting was six times greater than today, and double-digit interest rates gave cash savers positive real returns on their money (post-inflation) for the first time in a decade.

Such a “hard money” backdrop remains a long way off today, despite the fact that the U.S. could actually back its currency in circulation with a 40% cover-ratio at current prices ($1,390 per ounce, in fact). To cover M2, however – meaning primarily household cash savings, held on deposit and in money-market accounts – the Treasury’s 8,133 tonnes of gold would need to be valued almost 10 times higher per ounce (i.e. $13,230 per ounce). Absent that kind of price, and given the deflation-fearing consensus amongst central bankers and the academics they listen to, it ain’t going to happen. The people who could decide such a change believe we need devalued currency, not sound money.

3. Physical Monetization of Gold is Insufficient

The pace of physical monetization of gold – out of jewelry and mined ore into coin and large-bar form –  just isn’t great enough – yet. This dim outlook for a dictated return to some level of  a gold standard in the rich West, however, won’t prevent private savers, nor emerging-economy states, from continuing to build their own gold reserves.

Demand for “monetary” gold (i.e. coin and bar) worldwide is now running at twice the pace of five years ago, eating perhaps 49% of 2010′s total global-market supplies in the form of low-margin units for trading and storage, rather than as jewelry, bonding wire, dental fillings, or flakes floating in schnapps. Is that pace enough? A little under a century ago, Joseph Kitchen (he of the commodity-price ‘Kitchen Cycle’) studied bullion flows and found that – in a world where gold had been money, formally, for over 200 years – monetization of newly-mined gold was running well above 45%. Jewelry recycling no doubt topped that level, while existing monetary units surely retained their form.

Furthermore, at present, a little over a third of the world’s above-ground gold is currently held in coins or bars as measured by best estimates for investment plus central-bank stocks. [As such,] even at current rates of investment fabrication, it would take 15 years to raise the physically monetized level of gold to  the average proportion held by central banks between 1945 and 1971 ( i.e.  44%) [which was] the first, if not last, period when interventionist, welfare states in the West yoked their money supplies to gold.

The Role of Gold

Must gold play no role in money? Indexing a notional, government-only Bancor currency or Special Drawing Right against a basket of, say, Dollars, Euros, Yuan and gold might seem wise, but it appeals to the same thinking which gave us the United States’ exorbitant privilege of Dollar issuance, plus that explosion of state intervention in all economic activity which we’re still very much living with today. In time, [however,] the sheer weight of privately-held gold reserves may, in fact, tip us back towards the origins of the classical gold standard because that historical “accident”… developed out of freely-decided convention – not central-bank diktat or academic theorists – with private actors trading goods and settling debts with transfers of gold bullion.

Even in 1900, private holdings of gold coin still exceeded central-bank hoards worldwide, only losing ground as Europe’s second thirty-year war drew near and nation states began hoarding gold for war, vaulting for victory. It wasn’t until Great Britain re-introduced gold convertibility in 1925 that the Bank of England issued paper notes to represent its gold holdings – rather than enabling free circulation of gold in coin – thereby shifting the world from a gold-coin to a gold bullion standard.

So never say never because the largest hoarders of gold by far today are the newly-enriched consumers of emerging Asia’s two largest economies. India’s world-beating appetite for gold is beginning to devour low-margin investment gold coins and gold bars once more (some 30% of the subcontinent’s gold purchases, according to Sunil Kashyap at Scotia Mocatta). Chinese households have bought more gold in the last two-and-half years than the People’s Bank holds in total – and here too, cost-efficient gold coins and gold bars are gaining fast on non-investment forms.

Actively encouraged by Beijing, China’s rapid private accumulation of both gold and silver should remind economic historians that only structurally sound, growing economies have ever employed precious metals successfully as their monetary standard. We’ll have to wait and see whether China quite fits that bill but gold has never been a panacea for weak, over-indebted states, as the disaster of Britain’s return to gold in 1925 proved. “Our gold standard is not the cause but the consequence of our commercial prosperity,” noted prime minister Benjamin Disraeli in a speech to Glasgow industrialists fifty years earlier.


Seeking out the most efficient and most secure route to owning gold, and converting it into widely-accepted currency, is the next best thing to enjoying gold-backed currency. In a world of central  bankers hell-bent on devaluing your savings you need your own private gold standard.

[Got gold?]



Editor’s Note:

  • The above article consists of reformatted edited excerpts from the original for the sake of brevity, clarity and to ensure a fast and easy read. The author’s views and conclusions are unaltered.
  • Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given as per paragraph 2 above.
  • Sign up to receive every article posted via Twitter, Facebook, RSS feed or our FREE Weekly Newsletter.
  • Submit a comment. Share your views on the subject with all our readers.