Daniel Thornton, an economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, argues that the Fed’s policy of providing liquidity has “enormous potential to increase the money supply,” resulting in what The Wall Street Journal’s Real Time Economics blog calls “an inflation inferno.” [Personally,] I think it’s too soon to make significant changes to a portfolio based on inflation fears. Here’s why. Words: 550
So says Russ Koesterich (http://isharesblog.com/) in edited excerpts from his original article* which Lorimer Wilson, editor of www.munKNEE.com (Your Key to Making Money!), has edited further below for length and clarity – see Editor’s Note at the bottom of the page. (This paragraph must be included in any article re-posting to avoid copyright infringement.)
Koesterich goes on to say, in part:
Given the recent rise in bank lending, growth in the money supply and unprecedented nature of the Fed’s monetary experiment, inflation is certainly a significant risk. While there is a healthy theoretical debate on whether increases in the money supply lead to inflation, however, I believe the logic is simple. As the supply of money goes up, the value of money drops, causing inflation.
To be sure, the Fed is likely to try to use tools in its arsenal to combat the reality of…[my] theory. According to The Wall Street Journal, the Fed is considering implementing a new bond-buying program along with future possible stimulus to “relieve anxieties that money printing could fuel inflation later.” However, this possible approach, like other recent Fed tools, is untested and it’s unclear how it would work in reality if it were implemented.
What’s certain is that historically, rapid increases in the money supply have historically led to inflation in the United States, though there typically is a lag between money creation and inflation. Historically, it generally has taken two to three years before growth in the money supply has translated into a meaningful acceleration in inflation…So far, the Fed’s asset purchase programs — QE1, QE2 and Operation Twist — have not resulted in inflation. This is because, until recently, the extra money the Fed created sat quietly on bank balance sheets as banks contracted their lending.
Without bank lending, the money supply didn’t rise very much (although the monetary base, which includes bank reserves, has shot up) but the situation, has started to change. Outside of the mortgage market, bank lending has been rising since last summer. Commercial and industrial loans are now growing at 11% year-over-year, the fastest rate since 2008. As bank lending has risen, money supply growth has also started to accelerate; in January, M2 was up over 10% from the year before.
With M2 growth just starting to accelerate in late 2011, I’d be surprised to see a sharp spike in inflation this year. [While] headline inflation is likely to rise in the near term due to higher oil prices…this, however, should not be interpreted as the start of a broad spike in overall inflation, which over the long term will be about the same as core inflation.
While higher near-term headline inflation will be a drag on consumers, it’s unlikely to change my inflation outlook unless rising prices spill over into core inflation. [As such,] in my opinion, the risk of inflation is not an imminent one and is more of a risk for 2013 and beyond.
Editor’s Note: The above article has been has edited ([ ]), abridged, and reformatted (including the title, some sub-titles and bold/italics emphases) for the sake of clarity and brevity to ensure a fast and easy read. The article’s views and conclusions are unaltered and no personal comments have been included to maintain the integrity of the original article.
Why spend time surfing the internet looking for informative and well-written articles when we do it for you. We assess hundreds of articles every day, identify the best and then post edited excerpts of them to provide you with a fast and easy read. Sign-up for Automatic Receipt of Articles in your Inbox and follow us on FACEBOOK | and/or TWITTER .
The developed economies of the world have opened the money spigots…[and this] massive money and credit creation is sitting in the banking system like dry tinder just waiting for a spark to set it ablaze. How quickly it happens is anyone’s guess, but once it does we are likely to be enveloped in a worldwide inflation unlike anything before ever witnessed. [Let me explain further.] Words: 625
Evidence shows that the U.S. money supply trend is in the early stages of hyperbolic growth coupled with a similar move in the price of gold. All sign point to a further escalation of money-printing in 2012…followed by unexpected and accelerating price inflation, followed by a rise in nominal interest rates that will bring a sovereign debt crisis for the U. S. dollar with it as the cost of borrowing for the government escalates…[Let me show you the evidence.] Words: 660
Economists are telling central banks to accelerate monetary growth even faster…to avoid a bank balance sheet implosion with all the deflationary consequences that implies. [As such,] the prospects for 2012, and thereafter, are for Total Money Supply to continue its hyperbolic trend – and when such a trend becomes established it becomes almost impossible to stop because the whole debt-based economy and the banking system would collapse. [Let me explain further.] Words: 550
There is a difference between inflation and hyperinflation…and there is no gradual path from one to the other. To wind up with true hyperinflation, some very bad things have to happen. The government has to completely lose control… the populace has to completely lose faith in the system… or both at the same time. [Are we there yet? Let’s take a look.] Words: 1188